Blockchain for good?

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2143
Published date01 September 2017
AuthorRichard Adams,Glenn Parry,Beth Kewell
Date01 September 2017
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Strategic Change. 2017;26(5):429–437. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jsc © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 429
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2143
Abstract
The blockchain innovaon appears to represent viable catalysts for achieving global sustainable
development targets. Projects and iniaves seeking to extend the reach of distributed ledger
technologies (DLTs) seem mostly intended for the benet of for‐prot businesses, governments,
and consumers. DLT projects devised for the public good could aim, in theory, to fulll the United
Naon’s current sustainable development goals. Blockchain technology is being applied in ways
that could transform this ambion for good into a praccal reality.
1 
|
 INTRODUCTION
Current examples of blockchain deployment are being specied within
a value‐creaon remit that is most likely to benet for‐prot busi‐
nesses, governments, and consumers (Böhme, Chrisn, Edelman, &
Moore, 2015; McWaters, Galaski, & Chaterjee, 2016; Ng, 2013; Pos,
Davidson, & De Filippi, 2016; Swan, 2015; Walport, 2016). Received
ideas about what blockchain can and should be used for are based
on percepons that the key role of this technology is to unlock cost
savings and secure eciency gains, whilst also enabling widespread
business model transformaon (Walport, 2016). Within this scenario,
blockchain aordances (Gibson, 1978) are principally seen to “do good”
by resolving longstanding obstacles to protability and value capture
(Walport, 2016).
The aim of this arcle is to consider how blockchain soluons
could be used to achieve good outcomes for the sustainable develop
ment agenda by, for example, helping to fulll the UN’s (2015) sus
tainable development goals (SDGs). Kranzberg’s rst law of technology
avers that “Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral” (Kranz
berg, 1986, p. 545). Kranzberg reminds us that innovaons are morally
and ethically instanated. To date, research has tended to focus on the
technical characteriscs, eciency gains—and prots—to be yielded
from blockchain projects, experimental distributed ledger technolo
gies (DLTs), and “permissioned ledgers” being run by private consor
a (Böhme et al., 2015; McWaters et al., 2016; Ng, 2013; Pos et al.,
2016; Swan, 2015; Walport, 2016). While inially xed on the commer
cial and consumer benets to be drawn from blockchain innovaon,
aenon is beginning to shi toward the appropriaon of socially and
environmentally benecial use cases that aim to tackle global chal
lenges such as, for example, nancial exclusion (CPTM, 2016).
Drawing on aordance theory, this exploratory arcle reects on
innovave applicaons of blockchain projects that could help deliver
socially and environmentally benecial outcomes by challenging
exisng business models and providing new opportunies for value
creaon that also serve a philanthropic purpose (Botsman & Rogers,
2010). We call this “blockchain for good,” where “good” can be framed
in terms of the cited UN SDGs. These provide a vision for governmen‐
tal, corporate, and civic acon, leading the way toward “development
that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generaons to meet their own needs” (WCED, 1987, para 27).
The arcle proceeds as follows. First, we describe our approach
to this exploratory research. Second, we oer a brief overview
of the technological characteriscs of DLTs. Third, we examine the
noon that DLTs have unique aordances rendering them appropri‐
ate soluons to the SDGs. Consequently, in this arcle we begin to
explore the impact of DLTs on the UN’s SDGs.
2 
|
 AFFORDANCES
The reposioning of blockchain technologies as a device for mobilizing
good causes, including those posioned at a global level, represents a
considerable departure from their original remit as payments reconcili‐
aon systems which may be ulized without the need for banks and
clearing houses (Böhme et al., 2015; McWaters et al., 2016; Ng, 2013;
Pos et al., 2016; Swan, 2015; Walport, 2016; Welch, 2015). The
idencaon of such an important “change of use” draws aenon to
Blockchain for good?*
Beth Kewell1 | Richard Adams1 | Glenn Parry2
1University of Surrey, United Kingdom
2University of the West of England,
United Kingdom
Correspondence
Beth Kewell, Surrey Centre for the Digital
Economy, University of Surrey, Surrey
GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
Email: e.kewell@surrey.ac.uk
* JEL classicaon codes: D20, O38, O39.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT