Blockchain for good?
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2143 |
Published date | 01 September 2017 |
Author | Richard Adams,Glenn Parry,Beth Kewell |
Date | 01 September 2017 |
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Strategic Change. 2017;26(5):429–437. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jsc © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 429
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2143
Abstract
The blockchain innovaon appears to represent viable catalysts for achieving global sustainable
development targets. Projects and iniaves seeking to extend the reach of distributed ledger
technologies (DLTs) seem mostly intended for the benet of for‐prot businesses, governments,
and consumers. DLT projects devised for the public good could aim, in theory, to fulll the United
Naon’s current sustainable development goals. Blockchain technology is being applied in ways
that could transform this ambion for good into a praccal reality.
1
|
INTRODUCTION
Current examples of blockchain deployment are being specied within
a value‐creaon remit that is most likely to benet for‐prot busi‐
nesses, governments, and consumers (Böhme, Chrisn, Edelman, &
Moore, 2015; McWaters, Galaski, & Chaterjee, 2016; Ng, 2013; Pos,
Davidson, & De Filippi, 2016; Swan, 2015; Walport, 2016). Received
ideas about what blockchain can and should be used for are based
on percepons that the key role of this technology is to unlock cost
savings and secure eciency gains, whilst also enabling widespread
business model transformaon (Walport, 2016). Within this scenario,
blockchain aordances (Gibson, 1978) are principally seen to “do good”
by resolving longstanding obstacles to protability and value capture
(Walport, 2016).
The aim of this arcle is to consider how blockchain soluons
could be used to achieve good outcomes for the sustainable develop‐
ment agenda by, for example, helping to fulll the UN’s (2015) sus‐
tainable development goals (SDGs). Kranzberg’s rst law of technology
avers that “Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral” (Kranz‐
berg, 1986, p. 545). Kranzberg reminds us that innovaons are morally
and ethically instanated. To date, research has tended to focus on the
technical characteriscs, eciency gains—and prots—to be yielded
from blockchain projects, experimental distributed ledger technolo‐
gies (DLTs), and “permissioned ledgers” being run by private consor‐
a (Böhme et al., 2015; McWaters et al., 2016; Ng, 2013; Pos et al.,
2016; Swan, 2015; Walport, 2016). While inially xed on the commer‐
cial and consumer benets to be drawn from blockchain innovaon,
aenon is beginning to shi toward the appropriaon of socially and
environmentally benecial use cases that aim to tackle global chal‐
lenges such as, for example, nancial exclusion (CPTM, 2016).
Drawing on aordance theory, this exploratory arcle reects on
innovave applicaons of blockchain projects that could help deliver
socially and environmentally benecial outcomes by challenging
exisng business models and providing new opportunies for value
creaon that also serve a philanthropic purpose (Botsman & Rogers,
2010). We call this “blockchain for good,” where “good” can be framed
in terms of the cited UN SDGs. These provide a vision for governmen‐
tal, corporate, and civic acon, leading the way toward “development
that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generaons to meet their own needs” (WCED, 1987, para 27).
The arcle proceeds as follows. First, we describe our approach
to this exploratory research. Second, we oer a brief overview
of the technological characteriscs of DLTs. Third, we examine the
noon that DLTs have unique aordances rendering them appropri‐
ate soluons to the SDGs. Consequently, in this arcle we begin to
explore the impact of DLTs on the UN’s SDGs.
2
|
AFFORDANCES
The reposioning of blockchain technologies as a device for mobilizing
good causes, including those posioned at a global level, represents a
considerable departure from their original remit as payments reconcili‐
aon systems which may be ulized without the need for banks and
clearing houses (Böhme et al., 2015; McWaters et al., 2016; Ng, 2013;
Pos et al., 2016; Swan, 2015; Walport, 2016; Welch, 2015). The
idencaon of such an important “change of use” draws aenon to
Blockchain for good?*
Beth Kewell1 | Richard Adams1 | Glenn Parry2
1University of Surrey, United Kingdom
2University of the West of England,
United Kingdom
Correspondence
Beth Kewell, Surrey Centre for the Digital
Economy, University of Surrey, Surrey
GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
Email: e.kewell@surrey.ac.uk
* JEL classicaon codes: D20, O38, O39.
To continue reading
Request your trial