Belgium

AuthorEvelyne Terryn,Matthias E. Storme
Published date01 March 2009
DOI10.1177/0002716208328282
Date01 March 2009
Subject MatterArticles
ANNALS, AAPSS, 622, March 2009 95
Belgium illustrates the traditional European civil law
tradition of emphasis on principles of civil litigation
based on individual rights and standing. That tradition,
requiring legislative rather than judicial authorization,
has blocked general reform of collective representation
and led to gradual recognition of individual and rather
complex exceptions, overlaid by EU measures. No
innovative reforms have yet crystallized.
Keywords: flexibility of civil procedure; actions in the
collective interest; reflection on further
possibilities for collective action
1. The Court System in General
The Belgian court system and Procedural Law
is basically an exclusive competence of the fed-
eral authorities and not of the federated states;1
courts have no authority to make procedural
rules. Civil proceedings do not have a distinction
between trial and pretrial; are mainly in writing,
with only a supporting role for oral pleadings; and
are defined by the procedural autonomy of the
parties. Under new rules on costs in civil pro-
ceedings (2007), the losing party now has to
reimburse the costs of the winning party to a
much greater extent than before. Contingency
fees remain forbidden. In most procedures, par-
ties do not have to be represented by a lawyer
and can plead themselves. Lawyers appearing in
court do not need a written power of attorney.
Court fees are relatively low.
Outside the court system are the
Administrative Division of the Council of State
and the Constitutional Court. The main com-
petence of the former concerns demands for
annulment or provisional suspension of deci-
sions of the executive and any administrative
Belgium
By
MATTHIAS E. STORME
and
EVELYNE TERRYN
Matthias Storme is a professor of civil, procedural and
comparative law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,
Belgium.
Evelyne Terryn is a professor of commercial law at the
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
DOI: 10.1177/0002716208328282

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT