Assessing dangerousness in policing

AuthorLisa M. Dario,Michael D. White,John A. Shjarback
Date01 February 2019
Published date01 February 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12408
DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12408
RESEARCH ARTICLE
POLICE OFFICER DEATHS IN THE U.S.
Assessing dangerousness in policing
An analysis of officer deaths in the United States, 1970–2016
Michael D. White1Lisa M. Dario2John A. Shjarback3
1Arizona State University
2Florida Atlantic University
3University of Texasat El Paso
Correspondence
MichaelD. White, School of Criminology and
Criminal Justice, Arizona State University,
411N. Central Avenue Suite 680, Phoenix,
AZ85004.
Email:mdwhite1@asu.edu
Research Summary: A robust body of research findings
has established that policing is a dangerous profession.
Few scholars, however, have investigated the full picture
of the hazards in policing, which includes deaths occur-
ring in both felonious and nonfelonious circumstances. In
this study, we examine nearly 50 years of all police officer
line-of-duty deaths (1970–2016) using data from the Offi-
cer Down Memorial Page. We focus on long-term trends
in felonious and nonfelonious deaths annually, as well as
on trends in incident-level characteristics. We also employ
interrupted time-series analysis (ARIMA) to test the “war
on cops” thesis post–Ferguson.
Policy Implications: The number of line-of-duty deaths
has declined dramatically over the last five decades. Polic-
ing is a much safer profession now than it was 50 years
ago. Despite a 75% drop in deaths, however, there has
been remarkable stability in geographic-, temporal-,
and incident-level characteristics. Also, several notable
changes over time reflect favorably on improved safety in
policing, such as declines in deaths resulting from aircraft
crashes and accidental gunfire. Other trends are troubling,
though, such as the stability in deaths during auto pursuits
and a two-fold increase in deaths from vehicular assaults.
Currently, the “war on cops” thesis is not supported by any
Criminology & Public Policy. 2019;18:11–35. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/capp © 2019 American Society of Criminology 11
12 WHITE ET AL.
evidence, and we apply the 50-year lens in this study to
provide important context for understanding recent trends
in officer deaths.
KEYWORDS
line-of-duty deaths, police officer deaths, violence against police
The “bulletproof cop” does not exist. The officers who protect us must also be protected
against incapacitating physical, mental, and emotional health problemsas well as against
the hazards of their job. Their wellness and safety are crucial for them, their colleagues,
and their agencies, as well as the well-being of the communities they serve.
—President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing, 2015: 62
Research findings over the last several decades have consistently shown policing to be a dangerous
profession. Bierie (2017) noted that approximately 10% of all police officers are assaulted in a given
year. Data from the National Institute for Occupational Safety (NIOSH, 1996) indicate that police
officers experience the second highest rate of workplace homicides (behind taxi drivers), and more
generally,researchers have found that police have the highest occupational rate of violent victimization
(fatal and nonfatal assaults; Duhart, 2001; Fridell, Faggiani, Taylor, Brito, & Kubu, 2009). The focus
on dangerousness has become more acute since 2014 as a series of controversial police killings of
citizens has produced public outrage, riots, and a national movement demanding police reform (i.e.,
blacklivesmatter.com).At the same time, there have been several high-profile attacks on police officers,
most notably in Brooklyn (twoofficers killed, December 2014), Dallas (five officers killed, July 2016),
and Baton Rouge (three officers killed, July 2016). These attacks haveled some to conclude t hat there
is a “war on cops” (Canterbury, 2016; Mac Donald, 2016; Safir, 2015).1
A sizeable body of research has been aimed at exploring the dangerousness of the police profession
by examining available data on feloniousassaults and killings of police officers (Fr idell & Pate,1993;
Kaminski & Marvell, 2002; Kent, 2010; Lester, 1981, 1984; Meyer, Magedanz, Dahlin, & Chapman,
1981). These researchers have produced an accurate estimate of how often officers are assaulted and
killed (Bierie, 2017; Maguire, Nix, & Campbell, 2017) and a firm understanding of the community-
level (Bailey & Peterson, 1994; Jacobs & Carmichael, 2002), organizational-level (Fridell & Pate,
2001; Kaminski, 2002), and incident-level features (Mastrofski,Snipes, & Supina, 1996) that are asso-
ciated with the phenomena. In fact, each year the Federal Bureau of Investigation releases a report on
felonious assaults and killings of police, based on the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted
(LEOKA) Program (fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/leoka).2Moreover, Maguire et al. (2017) recently used
data from the Officer Down Memorial (ODMP) webpage (odmp.org) to test whether felonious killings
of police have increased notably since the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson.
Felonious killings of police represent a critically important phenomenon worthy of empirical study,
but these tragic cases represent only a subset of the larger universe of police officer line-of-duty deaths.
Both LEOKA and the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund (NLEOMF) report data on
accidental or nonfelonious deaths of police officers, although examinations of those data are conducted
infrequently.The lack of research on nonfelonious deaths of officers is troubling given that data suggest
that nonfelonious deaths may outnumber felonious killings (nleomf.com; President's Task Force on
21st Century Policing, 2015). Brandl (1996: 256) noted the “conceptualization of dangerousness in the
police occupation in terms of the murder and assault of police officers, to the exclusion of accidents,

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT