An Analysis of Civil Suits Filed Against Private and Public Prisons: A Comparison of Title 42: Section 1983 Litigation

AuthorCurtis R. Blakely,Vic W. Bumphus
Published date01 March 2005
Date01 March 2005
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0887403404266757
Subject MatterArticles
10.1177/0887403404266757CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY REVIEW / March 2005Blakely, Bumphus / CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION
An Analysis of Civil Suits Filed
Against Private and Public Prisons:
A Comparison of Title 42:
Section 1983 Litigation
Curtis R. Blakely
University of South Alabama
Vic W. Bumphus
The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
This study examines civil litigation filed against private and public prisons. Suits
alleging violation of Title 42: Section 1983 were considered. Findings reveal that
judicial statements made in response to private sector litigation carried greater
amounts of admonishment than did judicial statements made in response to litigation
filed against the public sector.Furthermore, it is evident that a portion of the federal
judiciary views privatization as potentially having negative effects on inmates and
staff.
Keywords: civil rights; lawsuits; grievances; private prisons; profit; employee
training
With the current popularity of imprisonment as a criminal sanction, the
demand for prison space is at an all-time high. This has resulted in severe
overcrowding. To obtain additional beds, solutions are increasingly being
sought from the private sector. One solution is the operation of prisons by
private corporations. Under such an arrangement, the government pays a
per diem fee to a private corporation to confine inmates on its behalf. Data
relating to the number of private prisons as well as their capacity and operat-
ing levels vary widely by source. However, a recent census revealed that
65,160 inmates (Criminal Justice Institute, 2000) are held in 140 private
jails and prisons spanning 31 states (Austin & Coventry, 2001; Greene,
2000; Thomas, 2000). Other estimates place approximately 2% to 5% of the
total U.S. inmate population in private facilities (Austin & Coventry, 2001;
74
Criminal Justice Policy Review, Volume 16, Number 1, March 2005 74-87
DOI: 10.1177/0887403404266757
© 2005 Sage Publications

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT