Age and Assessments of Disability Accommodation Request Normative Appropriateness

AuthorDavid C. Baldridge,Michele L. Swift
Published date01 May 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21679
Date01 May 2016
Human Resource Management, May–June 2016, Vol. 55, No. 3. Pp. 385–400
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
DOI:10.1002/hrm.21679
Correspondence to: Michele L. Swift, Assistant Professor, Oregon State University, College of Business,
2751 SW Jefferson Street, Corvallis, OR 97331-2603, Phone: 541.737.4110, Fax: 541-737.4890,
E-mail: michele.swift@bus. oregonstate.edu
(Baldridge & Swift, 2013) and that lack of per-
ceived normative support is among the most
common reasons for withholding requests. That
is, beyond the legal merit of an accommodation
request, people with disabilities attempt to assess
whether or not people at work, including super-
visors and coworkers, would approve of them
requesting a particular disability accommoda-
tion (Baldridge & Veiga, 2006). As a result, even
though the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
of 1990, for example, prohibits discrimination
As employees age, do they perceive more
or less normative support for request-
ing disability accommodation? We raise
this question because in the United
States and elsewhere the labor force con-
tinues to age (Posthuma & Campion, 2009), and
as age increases, employees are more likely to have
disabilities that require accommodation (Brault,
2008). Research on workplace accommodation
indicates that employees with disabilities often
do not request needed disability accommodation
AGE AND ASSESSMENTS OF
DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION
REQUEST NORMATIVE
APPROPRIATENESS
DAVID C. BALDRIDGE AND MICHELE L. SWIFT
In the United States, the labor force continues to age. As age increases, so does
the likeliness of needing disability accommodation. Prior research indicates that
people with disabilities often do not request needed accommodations when
they assess that others at work would perceive a request as normatively inap-
propriate. Little, however, is currently known about the impact of age on these
assessments. In this study, we integrate prior research on age, disability, social
identity, and climate to propose and then test a model of the relationship between
requesters’ age and their normative assessments using survey data from 242
people who became hearing impaired prior to entering the workforce. As hypoth-
esized, requester age was negatively associated with normative appropriateness
assessment favorability. Moreover, this negative infl uence was stronger in for-
profi t organizational contexts and in workgroup contexts in which the requester
lacked a coworker with a disability. Having a coworker with a similar disability
also partially mediated the moderating effect of organization type on the associa-
tion between age and normative appropriateness assessment favorability. Impli-
cations for research and practice are discussed. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: employee rights, legal issues, disability, age, accommodation
386 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, MAY–JUNE 2016
Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm
Simply put, people
with disabilities
appear to face a
straightforward yet
troubling question,
“If I ask for a needed
accommodation, will
I be better or worse
off?”
and social pressure for individuals in many
nations to work later in life. Yet, as we explain
in this article, even with legislation ensuring the
right to disability accommodation, older employ-
ees with disabilities may perceive less support than
younger employees with disabilities for requesting
needed disability accommodation. In our view, if
employees are expected to work to an older age,
it is essential that human resource (HR) profes-
sionals and managers create climates where older
workers can anticipate normative support for dis-
ability accommodation requests. Toward that end,
scholars need to better understand factors associ-
ated with favorable and unfavorable normative
assessments.
In the current study, we first draw on social
identity theory and the workplace age and dis-
ability literature to explore how age and disability
influence normative appropriateness assessments
for requesting disability accommodation. We then
draw on the organizational climate literature to
examine the potential moderating influence of
the workplace context. In so doing, we extend
prior research in at least four important ways.
First, we extend the limited research on request-
ers’ normative appropriateness assessments. These
assessments are critical because research indicates
that people with disabilities often do not request
needed disability accommodation when they
do not anticipate normative support, yet little is
currently known about factors that shape these
pivotal assessments. Second, as encouraged by
Baldridge and Veiga (2006), we investigate the role
of an important requester attribute, age. The rela-
tionship between requesters’ age and their nor-
mative appropriateness assessments is interesting
and important to study because age and disabil-
ity are correlated, yet age and disability can also
be expected to compete for salience in observers’
social identity categorization of a person making
a disability accommodation request. While age
does not affect the legal merit of an accommoda-
tion request, age can influence supervisors’ and
coworkers’ perceptions of the requester as a mem-
ber of a social identity group (i.e., disabled, old).
These categorizations, in turn, affect normative
expectations regarding what behaviors are appro-
priate. Third, we extend the work of Baldridge and
Swift (2013), Baldridge and Veiga (2001, 2006),
and Davison and colleagues (2009) by examining
the influence of the workplace request context on
the strength of the relationship between requester
age and normative appropriateness assessment
favorability. In particular, we examine one orga-
nizational and one workgroup attribute thought
to be important that remain understudied: orga-
nizational type (i.e., the impact of working in a
in employment against people with a disability
and explicitly forbids employers from considering
potential negative coworker reactions in deciding
whether or not to grant a disability accommo-
dation, people with disabilities often withhold
requests when they perceive that others would
not be supportive (Davison, O’Leary, Schlosberg,
& Bing, 2009). Coworkers are a significant part
of employees’ workplace experience (Chiaburu &
Harrison, 2008), so coworkers’ anticipated reac-
tions to an accommodation request is expected
to significantly affect the likelihood of requesting
accommodation. Further, it has been suggested
that normative assessments are particularly impor-
tant because many employers and supervisors seek
to avoid the cost and inconvenience they associate
with disability accommodation (Basas, 2008) and
subtly discouraging requests is thought to create
less legal risk than outright refusal once requests
are made (Baldridge & Veiga, 2006).
The withholding of disability
accommodation requests is con-
cerning because people with disabil-
ities often have the best knowledge
regarding when accommodation is
needed and which accommodations
would be most helpful (Baldridge &
Swift, 2013). If people with disabili-
ties are discouraged from requesting
accommodation, valuable perfor-
mance information is lost (Baldridge
& Veiga, 2001), and it may be impos-
sible for these employees to contrib-
ute fully to their work organizations
(Markel & Barclay, 2009). Requesting
accommodation in an unsupport-
ive context, however, may involve
psychosocial costs to the requester
that outweigh the anticipated benefit of receiv-
ing accommodation (Baldridge & Veiga, 2006).
Simply put, people with disabilities appear to face
a straightforward yet troubling question, “If I ask
for a needed accommodation, will I be better or
worse off?”
Research also indicates that a person’s age
can affect normative expectations regarding the
appropriateness of requesting help (Mackenzie,
Gekoski, & Knox, 2006), yet a review of the litera-
ture did not uncover research specifically exam-
ining the impact of an employee’s age on his or
her assessments of the normative appropriateness
of requesting disability accommodation. This is
a significant gap in the literature because older
employees represent a significant, and growing,
portion of the workforce (Ng & Feldman, 2008,
2012), age is positively correlated with disability
(Brault, 2008), and there is significant economic

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT