After Brexit: Rethinking the structure of the UK economy and its branding strategies

Published date01 September 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2228
Date01 September 2018
RESEARCH ARTICLE
After Brexit: Rethinking the structure of the UK economy and
its branding strategies
Barry Ardley
Lincoln International Business School,
University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
Correspondence
Barry Ardley, Lincoln International Business
School, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool
Campus, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.
Email: bardley@lincoln.ac.uk
Abstract
Brexit is currently making the economic climate uncertain. It will have an impact on the eco-
nomic health of the UK economy and its products may suffer as consequence. It presents condi-
tions for engendering both the positive and negative features of a falling currency. Associated
with Brexit is the possibility of negative customer brand perceptions, a result of the UK country
of origin effect. This raises the issue of considering alternative strategic routes to growth.
1|INTRODUCTION: BREXIT, BRANDS,
AND THE ECONOMY
In terms of a rare and largely unexpected occurrence, there is little to
compare with the UK's Brexit decision taken in 2016. It surely can be
seen as what Andersen & Poulfelt (2014) describe as a Black Swan
event. The subsequent uncertainties generated by the decision have
been manifested in the falling levels of the exchange rate. The pound
fell 6% in 2 min according to the Independent (2016), not long after
the vote to leave took place. Uncertainties can result in these types of
Flash Crashes.So far, however, Brexit fears have not led to negative
growth rates and there may be opportunities from lower export prices
and the flexibility to undertake new trade deals (Guardian, 2018). Posi-
tive openings for UK brands may exist in other strategic marketing
alternatives as well, considered later in this article. This article draws
on macroeconomic theory related to exchange rates and data and
additionally, a marketing perspective, utilizing country of origin, brand
equity, and consumer co-creation perspectives. These differing view-
points are adopted in order to examine to what extent Brexit might
impact on the health of UK products and how any adverse factors
might be mitigated. Relevantly, an increased focus from government
on supporting key brands for exporting, may also have an impact on
the concept of creating more shared values. However, evidence would
suggest that much needs to be done to maintain a competitive edge
in the global market place.
2|THE CURRENT ECONOMIC CLIMATE
Concerns over the pound have been debated for some while and the
value against the dollar fell by around 20% between May and October
2016. Indeed, this may represent an opportunity for exporters. Low
prices could lead to a greater demand in the short term as well as
favorable levels of employment (Krugman, 2008). Local firms also gain
an advantage over foreign firms in the home market. More tourism
may take place in the UK due to the lower value of the pound and
there has been a boost to stock market prices, as overseas firms see
more possible bargains in terms of share prices and real estate. There
may also be a chance to rebalance the economy more toward
manufacturing. Here, the potential for exploring new trade deals exist,
as UK trade with countries outside the EU accounts for more than
50% of total trade (ONS, 2018). This is contingent on many factors
though. First, we need to have the right goods for export that are in
demand. In this regard, Thirwall (1982), has demonstrated this was not
the case a few decades ago, though a more flexible and skilled labor
market has helped much improve the UK economy today. The Olym-
pic Games' success and the rise of Cool Britannia helped to illustrate
this. However, there is much to be done to maintain this position due
to the rise of competition in both goods and services from Asia.
Despite rising levels of immigration, unemployment has remained low
which illustrates the risk of skills gaps post Brexit and in this respect,
Tung (2016) illustrates the importance of developing employees with
a bicultural identity. This will become more important as competitors
such as China move up the value chain and compete on innovation
rather than low cost. This represents a move away from made-
in-China toward created-in-China (Futurebrand, 2014).
JEL Classification codes: A12, M30, M31
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2228
Strategic Change. 2018;27:441446. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jsc © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 441

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT