Administrative Response to Consequences of COVID-19 Emergency Responses: Observations and Implications From Gender-Based Violence in Argentina

DOI10.1177/0275074020942081
AuthorLuciana Polischuk,Daniel L. Fay
Published date01 August 2020
Date01 August 2020
Subject MatterStreet-Level Crisis ManagementManaging Domestic Violence During a Public Health Crisis
https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020942081
American Review of Public Administration
2020, Vol. 50(6-7) 675 –684
© The Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0275074020942081
journals.sagepub.com/home/arp
Managing Domestic Violence During a Public Health Crisis
Introduction
Gender-based violence is a ubiquitous policy issue world-
wide. Evidence suggests that gender-based violence dispro-
portionately affects women and girls and is most commonly
exercised by intimate partners at gender-based violence sur-
vivors’ homes (Merry, 2011). Home isolation and confine-
ment can therefore prove problematic for gender-based
violence survivors in normal times, however, during a global
pandemic, these effects are exacerbated. One of the most
common measures across the globe to slow the spread of the
COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic and reduce
public health systems’ stress is the implementation of restric-
tions on citizens’ mobility and stay-at-home orders (Anderson
et al., 2020). While these measures have proven effective in
containing COVID-19 contagion, they have also placed a
significant burden on gender-violence survivors. According
to UN Women, gender-based violence, a persistent human
rights violation, escalated during COVID-19 lockdowns evi-
denced by increased demand for services related to domestic
violence shelters and helplines across the world, including
the United States (Mlambo-Ngcuka, 2020). However, in
some areas, domestic violence reports saw a sharp decrease,
which advocates argue is a result of increased difficulty in
reporting during quarantine (Southall, 2020).
Gender-based violence is intimately related to patriarchy,
which creates dichotomic structural gender divisions that
favor a dominant form of masculinity over women and non-
hegemonic gender identities. The stereotypical social con-
struction of hegemonic masculinity builds a narrow
relationship with the use of violence against socially subor-
dinated gender identities, including women assigned female
at birth and transwomen (Lombardi et al., 2002). Hegemonic
masculinity is also built on a gendered division of labor with
a higher recognition of labor outside the home and the invisi-
bilization and marginalization of the reproductive labor
mainly carried out by women (Federici, 2004; Moser, 1993).
942081ARPXXX10.1177/0275074020942081The American Review of Public AdministrationPolischuk and Fay
research-article2020
1Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
Corresponding Author:
Luciana Polischuk, Askew School of Public Administration and Policy,
600 W. College Ave., 639 Bellamy Building, Florida State University,
Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Email: lp16d@my.fsu.edu
Administrative Response to
Consequences of COVID-19
Emergency Responses: Observations
and Implications From Gender-Based
Violence in Argentina
Luciana Polischuk1 and Daniel L. Fay1
Abstract
Many governments across the globe enacted mandatory stay-at-home orders to slow the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.
One of the many consequences of these governmental protection orders is to confine potential perpetrators and victims of
gender-based violence in close proximity thereby reducing the opportunity for survivors to report abuse and get assistance.
In this essay, we describe the multilevel governmental response in Argentina to address gender-based violence during the
first month of mandatory stay-at-home order amid the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. National and provincial governments
enacted innovative and coordinated responses to gender-based violence that targeted systemic causes of gender-based
violence, ensured continuity of existing services, and generated new communication strategies to allow nonverbal reporting
during the pandemic. The Argentinean example suggests that governmental organizations should consider the gendered
effects of government responses to emergencies and respond through a multilevel and cross-sectoral response to protect
groups disproportionately affected by the crisis and resulting policy.
Keywords
gender, violence, COVID-19, emergency management, implementation

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT