Addiction Treatment Clients’ Reactions to Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs

DOI10.1177/0022042617699196
Date01 July 2017
AuthorJoseph Guydish,Noah Gubner,Anna Pagano,Catherine Henderson,Barbara Tajima,Deborah Yip
Published date01 July 2017
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042617699196
Journal of Drug Issues
2017, Vol. 47(3) 433 –447
© The Author(s) 2017
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0022042617699196
journals.sagepub.com/home/jod
Article
Addiction Treatment Clients’
Reactions to Graphic Warning
Labels on Cigarette Packs
Anna Pagano1, Noah Gubner2, Barbara Tajima2, Deborah Yip2,
Catherine Henderson2, and Joseph Guydish2
Abstract
Graphic warning labels (GWLs) on cigarette packs have been tested among diverse groups at
high risk for tobacco use. However, little is known about the effectiveness of GWL interventions
for persons with substance use disorders, whose smoking prevalence is 3 to 4 times that of the
general population. After a experimental study which exposed clients in residential addiction
treatment to GWLs for 30 days, we conducted five focus groups with trial participants (N =
33) to explore how exposure to the labels may have impacted their readiness to quit smoking.
Focus group interviews were analyzed thematically. Interviewees reported that GWLs were
more effective than text-based warnings for increasing quit intentions due to greater cognitive
and emotional impact. Male and female interviewees expressed gender-specific reactions to
the labels. Addiction treatment programs are a strategic site for GWL and other tobacco
interventions due to the tobacco-vulnerable populations they serve.
Keywords
addiction treatment, substance abuse, smoking cessation, graphic warning labels
Introduction
Graphic warning labels (GWLs) depicting the health risks of smoking are currently legislated for
use in over 100 countries worldwide (Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, 2017), but not in the
United States. Currently, U.S. cigarette packs bear only text-based warnings with messages
approved by the Surgeon General and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In the last
several years, the FDA has attempted to join other countries in implementing Article 11 of the
World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO, 2003),
which encourages the use of GWLs on tobacco products. The tobacco industry initially blocked
the FDA’s attempts, claiming that requiring them to use GWLs threatened their First Amendment
rights. In 2012, after a protracted legal battle, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
tasked the FDA with demonstrating the effectiveness of GWLs (Public Health Law Center,
2016).
1Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Oakland, CA, USA
2Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
Corresponding Author:
Anna Pagano, Research Scientist, Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 180
Grand Avenue, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
Email: apagano@prev.org
699196JODXXX10.1177/0022042617699196Journal of Drug IssuesPagano et al.
research-article2017

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT