§ 4.07 Amendment or Revocation of a Marital Agreement

JurisdictionUnited States
Publication year2021

§ 4.07 Amendment or Revocation of a Marital Agreement

A marital agreement can be amended or revoked during marriage. A clear way to effect such an amendment or revocation is to execute a written instrument that states the new intention of the parties. Absent such a written instrument, the behavior of the parties can effectuate an implied amendment or revocation, depending upon the language of the original agreement.429 For example, if the parties do not act during marriage in accordance with the agreement's terms, an implied amendment or revocation can be inferred.430 Other actions, such as mutually tearing up the agreement, can act as a revocation.431 Actions that are inconsistent with the agreement can be perceived by a court as an implied amendment.432

The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act provides that a premarital agreement may only be revoked during marriage by a written agreement.433 It therefore appears that in states that have adopted this Act revocation by action during marriage will not be accepted.434 Note that, because the UPAA only addresses revocation during marriage, one could still argue that actions before marriage could revoke the agreement.

A Virginia court has held that, if prospective spouses sign a premarital contract, cancel the wedding, and then later marry, the wedding cancellation acts as a repudiation of the contract.435 The court noted that a postponement, not a cancellation, might be treated differently. In another case, where the parties signed a prenuptial agreement, cancelled the wedding, and married six months later, the court concluded that the contract was not revoked by the cancellation.436

When, after the agreement was signed, the parties postponed their wedding date for three months, a Texas court concluded that the agreement still applied.437

Even if parties waive any marital property rights in a prenuptial agreement, some shared or survivorship rights can arise if the parties own property in joint names or commingle their property into joint bank accounts.438

An Ohio court has ruled that an attempted amendment to a premarital agreement signed during marriage should not be enforced.439 This holding is based on the Ohio rule that postnuptial agreements should not be enforced.


--------

Notes:

[429] For example, the agreement might contain a provision requiring a signed written instrument to amend or revoke the agreement.

[430] See, e.g.:

Colorado: In re Marriage of Zimmerman, 714 P.2d 927 (Col. App. 1986).
Idaho:
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT