No. 33, 2022
Index
- Foreword - Creighton Law Review
- The Human Genome Project's Threat to the Human Constitution: Protections from Nebraska Constitutionalism
- If Standing Bear Could Talk . . . Why There Is No Constitutional Right to Kill a Partially-born Human Being
- The Grand Jury in Nebraska
- Judicial Review Standards in Unicameral Legislative Systems: a Positive Theoretic and Historical Analysis
- The Complicated World of the Electing Spouse: in Re Estate of Myers and Recent Statutory Developments
- Dead or Alive? Territorial Restrictions in Covenants-not-to-compete in Nebraska
- Determining Testamentary Intent in a Holographic Will by Referencing Typewritten Language? Not in Nebraska: an Analysis of the Nebraska Supreme Court's Ruling in Estate of Foxley v. Hogan
- Should Unexercised Stock Options Be Considered Gross Income Under State Law for Purposes of Calculating Monthly Child Support Payments?
- The Residual Exception to the Hearsay Rule: the Complete Treatment
- Imports, Etc., Ltd. v. Abf Freight System, Inc.: the Eighth Circuit Confuses Rather Than Clarifies the Deregulation of the Trucking Industry by Applying the Filed Rate Doctrine
- Fairness in Habeas Petition Filings for Pro Se Prisoners: the Propriety of the Eighth Circuit's Holding in Nichols v. Bowersox
- Content, Form, and Context - the Eighth Circuit Misapplies the Connick Test in Examining the First Amendment Rights of a Public Employee in Buazard v. Meridith
- The Requirement of Scope of Employment Under the Federal Tort Claims Act . . . Where Is the Line? Scrutinizing Primeaux v. United States
- Deferred Compensation Planning, the Exclusive Benefit Rule, and the Hughes Aircraft Case: Has the Employer Benefit Restriction Been Altered With Respect to Erisa Qualified Pension Plans?
- Kumho Tire Company: the Expansion of the Court's Role in Screening Every Aspect of Every Expert's Testimony at Every Stage of the Proceedings
- Why Practicality Should Trump Technicality: a Brief Argument for the Precedential Value of Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Decisions
- A Plurality of the Supreme Court Asserts a Due Process Right to Do Absolutely Nothing in City of Chicago v. Morales
- The Frailties of Alden v. Maine: a Decision Contrary to the Constitution, Precedent, and Ancient Propositions of Law
- Foreword - Creighton Law Review
- Why Nebraska Needs Civil Commitment Proceedings for Sex Offenders
- Revisiting Rhode Island v. Innis: Offering a New Interpretation of the Interrogation Test
- The Confrontation Clause and the Hearsay Rule: the Current State of a Failed Marriage in Need of a Quick Divorce
- If It's Not a Runaway, It's Not a Real Grand Jury
- United States v. Castro: the Fifth Circuit Authorizes Administrative Impoundments Regardless of an Officer's Motives as Long as the Impoundment Is Based on Standard Police Procedures