Write On!, 082021 WYBJ, Vol. 44 No. 4. 38
Author | Michael R. Smith |
Position | Vol. 44 4 Pg. 38 |
The Three Uses of the Accord Signal in Legal Citation Part 1
Michael R. Smith
University of Wyoming College of Law Laramie, Wyoming
One of
the most underused and misused components of legal citation
is the accord introductory signal. According to the
Bluebook legal citation manual, introductory signals are
placed in front of citations to authorities to “show
how those authorities support or relate to a proposition
given in the text” of a passage of legal
writing.
A close reading of this explanation of the accord signal indicates that the signal is customarily used in three situations. In this edition of this column, I will explain the first and most common use of the accord signal. In my next edition of this column, I will explain the other two uses.
Use 1: To Introduce Additional Supporting Authorities After Citing the Source of a Quote
The first and most common use of the accord signal is to introduce additional supporting authority after citing the source of a quote. This use of accord occurs when a legal writer decides to quote (rather than paraphrase) a proposition yet wants to cite more than one authority for that proposition. In this situation, the writer should first cite the source of the quote (with no introductory signal) and then introduce the other supporting authorities in the same citation sentence with the accord signal (using a lowercase “a” for accord). Consider this example from a recent case by the Court of Appeals of Texas: 1 A trial court may render summary judgment when “there
2 is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving
3 party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the issues
4 [presented].” TEX. R. CIV. P. 166a(c); accord Lightning Oil
5 Co. v. Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC, 520 S.W.3d 39, 45 (Tex.
6 2017); Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. Knott, 128 S.W.3d
7 211, 215–16 (Tex. 2003). We review a trial court’s summary
8 judgment de novo. Lightning Oil, 520 S.W.3d at 45; Merri-
9 man v. XTO Energy, Inc., 407 S.W.3d 244, 248...
To continue reading
Request your trial