Why Parenthood, and Why Now? Gay Men's Motivations for Pursuing Parenthood

AuthorJordan B. Downing,Abbie E. Goldberg,April M. Moyer
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00687.x
Published date01 February 2012
Date01 February 2012
ABBIE E. GOLDBERG,JORDAN B. DOWNING,AND APRIL M. MOYER Clark University
Why Parenthood, and Why Now? Gay Men’s
Motivations for Pursuing Parenthood
The current qualitative study of 35 preadoptive
gay male couples (70 men) examined gay men’s
motivations to parent and their reasons for
pursuing parenthood at the current time. Similar
to heterosexual couples, gay men described
a range of psychologically oriented reasons
as shaping their decision to become parents.
Some of these (e.g., desire to teach a child
tolerance) may have been uniquely shaped by
their sexual minority status, and others (e.g.,
desire to give a child a good home) in part
reflect their adoptive status. Men named age,
finances, and relationship factors, as well as
unique contextual factors such as the need to
find and move to gay-friendly neighborhoods, as
influencing their readiness to pursue parenthood
at the current time. Gay men’s motivations
to parent echo normative life course decision-
making processes, but also reflect concerns that
are uniquely informed by their sexual minority
status.
Gay men have long been stereotyped as unin-
terested in children and parenting (see Mallon,
2004), and yet empirical research does not sup-
port these stereotypes. Using national survey
data, Gates, Badgett, Macomber, and Chambers
(2007) estimated that over half of gay men (52%)
reported that they hoped to become parents in the
future. A study of urban sexual minority youth
Department of Psychology, Clark University, 950 Main St.,
Worcester, MA 01610 (agoldberg@clarku.edu).
Key Words: gay men, life course, motivations, parenthood,
qualitative, social constructionist.
found that 86% of young gay men expected to
raise children in the future (D’Augelli, Rendina,
& Sinclair, 2008). In addition, estimates based on
national survey data found that 1 in 5 male same-
sex couples were raising children in 2000, up
from 1 in 20 in 1990 (Gates & Ost, 2004; Gates
et al., 2007). Thus, an increasing number of gay
men view fathering as an expected part of their
life course trajectories (Rabun & Oswald, 2009).
Such changes are, in part, a function of broad-
scale sociohistorical changes, such as increasing
family diversity, advancements in reproductive
technologies, and a growing liberalism toward
the rights of sexual minorities (Goldberg, 2010).
Of course, this is not to say that gay parenthood
is universally accepted: A 2003 Gallup poll
found that 49% of Americans said that same-sex
couples should have the legal right to adopt,
whereas 48% said they should not (Robison,
2003).
Despite gay men’s increased interest in and
enactment of parenthood (Goldberg, 2010), par-
ticularly through adoption (Gates et al., 2007),
no research has explicitly examined gay men’s
motivations to parent. Such research is important
given the unique context of gay male parenthood.
Gay men who choose to become parents do so
outside of the traditional model of family devel-
opment, where a man and woman have a biolog-
ical child. Further, gay men who seek to adopt
pursue parenthood within a unique relational
context whereby neither parent is genetically
related to the child. Additionally, gay men who
seek to become parents do so amid institutions
and discourses that privilege heteronormativity
and thus present challenges to their parenting
Family Relations 61 (February 2012): 157 – 174 157
DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00687.x
158 Family Relations
pursuits. Given the unique social and relational
context in which gay men consider and pursue
parenthood, of interest is how gay men construct
their parenting desires and motivations. Given
the highly intentional and time-consuming
nature of becoming parents for gay men (Down-
ing, Richardson, Kinkler, & Goldberg, 2009),
also of interest are the factors that influence the
timing of parenthood for gay men. Thus, the
current qualitative study of 70 gay men (from
35 couples) examined gay men’s motivations
for parenthood and their explanations for why
they were pursuing parenthood currently. We
aim to extend prior research by focusing specif-
ically on motivations to parent among gay men
who were in the process of adopting their first
child.
We first discuss the general research on
motivations for parenthood. This literature has
largely focused on heterosexual couples who
were becoming or had become parents via
biological means (as opposed to adoption); there
is also a small literature on lesbians’ motivations
for parenthood. In reviewing these literatures,
we do not mean to suggest that gay men will
necessarily construct their parental desires in a
parallel fashion. Rather, we assert that the desire
to parent is human, not heterosexual, warranting
our examination of prior research on the subject.
At the same time, we believe that subjective
constructions of parental motivations are shaped
by one’s social location, relational configuration,
and majority-minority status. Reflecting this
perspective, we then discuss the research on gay
male adoptive parenthood specifically. Then, we
discuss factors that may influence the timing of
parenthood. Finally, we define our theoretical
framework.
HETEROSEXUAL COUPLES’MOTIVATIONS
FOR PURSUING PARENTHOOD
Being a parent is often described as a key devel-
opmental milestone in the adult life course, and
research suggests that the decision to become
a parent is driven by a variety of motivational
factors (Fawcett, 1988). In the research on het-
erosexual couples’ motivations to parent, men
and women often highlight perceived psycho-
logical or personal rewards of children, such as
the emotional benefits of the parent-child bond,
enjoyment of children, and personal fulfillment
(Dion, 1995; Langdridge, Connolly, & Sheeran,
2000; Langdridge, Sheeran, & Connolly, 2005).
For instance, in their sample of 34 heterosexual
couples, Langdridge et al. (2000) found that the
desire to give love and to receive love were
described as the most salient motivators by both
men and women. The idea that parenthood was
‘‘the most worthwhile thing in life’’ was also
salient.
In addition to psychological reasons, the
role-related benefits of children (e.g., children
ensure that the family line will continue; chil-
dren ensure that the parent will not be alone)
have also been described as motivators for par-
enthood (Dion, 1995; Langdridge et al., 2005).
Research suggests that relationship factors may
also drive the desire to parent (Langdridge et al.,
2005; W. B. Miller, 1994). For example, hetero-
sexual men and women, but particularly men,
frequently describe their motivation to parent
as driven, at least in part, by their partner’s
desire to parent (Miller, 1994). Some hetero-
sexual men and women explain their desire to
parent in terms of their perception that having
children will ‘‘complete’’ the marriage (New-
ton, Hearn, Yuzpe, & Houle, 1992). Thus, the
literature on heterosexual couples suggests that
a myriad of psychological, role-related, and
relational factors may shape motivations to
parent.
Much of the research in this area has focused
on heterosexual women’s motivations for par-
enthood because they are viewed as the driving
force in becoming parents compared to their
husbands (Biblarz & Stacey, 2010). Studies
that do include both men and women have
described differences in how heterosexual men
and women view the prospect of parenthood
(Gerson, 1986; Langdridge et al., 2005). Lang-
dridge et al.’s (2005) study of 897 heterosexual
couples found that women were more likely to
cite a ‘‘biological drive’’ as motivating them to
parent as compared to men. The tendency for
women to describe their desire to parent as an
innate yearning may perhaps be influenced by the
societal belief that motherhood enables women
to actualize an ‘‘essential’’ aspect of woman-
hood (Siegenthaler & Bigner, 2000). Men in
Langdridge and colleague’s study were more
likely than women to identify ‘‘continuing the
family name’’ as a motivator for parenthood.
Continuing the family lineage through biological
parenthood may be especially important to men
in part because masculinity norms emphasize
children as a status symbol for men (Hammer &
McFerran, 1988).

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex