Whose Water Is It?

Published date01 May 2016
Date01 May 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12153
AuthorHilary A. B. Lambert
Whose Water Is It?
By HILARY A. B. LAMBERT*
ABSTRACT. Legal protection of the USA’s water resources was reduced
during the Bush-Cheney Administration (2000–2008), facilitating coal, oil,
and gas development at the expense of clean water. The “Halliburton
Loophole” in the 2005 Energy Act exempted all oil and gas development
activities, including fracking (hydraulic fracturing), from the Clean Water
Act, Clean Drinking Water Act, and other federal statutes. Two U.S.
Supreme Court rulings weakened the Clean Water Act’s protections of
headwaters, streams, wetlands, and other water bodies. In New York
State, communities faced with the imminent prospect of fracking by
energy companies organized. From 2008–2014, they prevented fracking
in New York. Water protection played a major role in energizing
community response, In 2015, a fragile, but resilient, ban was declared
statewide. In Kentucky, 150 years of coal mining resulted in pollution of
many waterways, with hundreds of stream miles buried beneath
mountaintop removal debris. Kentuckians have been pushing back since
the 1930s to protect communities, farms, and water quality. They remain
hopeful in the face of great odds. Urban populations making daily use of
cheap, clean water and fossil-fuel-powered energy sources have little
knowledge of these struggles. In rural America, the fight to protect
communities, lands, and waters from energy exploitation is lifelong.
Introduction: Loss of Water Protection
Water quality is a concern of both urban and rural residents. However,
in most cases, the threats to water quality occur in rural watersheds, far
*Executive Director/Steward of the Cayuga Lake Watershed Network, a watershed
protection and educational NGO in central New York State. AB, anthropology, Brown
University; MA, PhD, geography, Clark University. Taught at Rutgers University, Miami
of Ohio, University of Kentucky. Former editor of FOCUS (American Geographical
Society of New York). Associate Director of the Kentucky Waterways Alliance. Com-
munity organizer on behalf of the environment for many years in Kentucky and New
York State.
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 75, No. 3 (May, 2016).
DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12153
V
C2016 American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc.
from big cities. As a result, the burden falls on rural residents to fight
the companies that drill, mine, and clear-cut the land surfaces and
pump chemicals into the ground. Although the residents of cities reap
the benefits of the work carried out by rural activists, the latter receive
little support from theformer.
This article focuses on threats by private interests to the quality and
quantity of water in rural New York State and the Commonwealth of
Kentucky, where the author has personal and working experience. The
adjacent states of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Michigan have
been equally impacted by widespread seizure of natural resources for
use by the energy industry and related interests. The American West
has been dealing with energy development for decades, intensively
since the “fracking revolution” commenced in 2000. This nationwide
frenzy to develop oil and gas in U.S. territory at all costs was permitted
by legal and regulatory actions of the Bush-Cheney Administration and
a compliant Congress (2001–2008). Most U.S. states have numerous
groups fighting to protect clean water and air, starkly relevant in an era
of climate change and water shortages.
The question across rural America is not simply, “Whose water is it?”
but also “Whose life is it?” When private companies appropriate clean
water and leave behind water contaminated with chemicals, this poses
a threat to the health of natural systems and to the people who rely on
them.
In many places, the oil and gas energy industry has freely expropri-
ated the “quiet enjoyment” of land, air, and water that rural Americans,
including Native American tribes, have long relied on. The energy
industry and its mega-developer cousins seem to operate on the basis
of “act first, apologize later,” exploiting rural America as a free or low-
cost natural resource fiefdom, with little fear of negative consequences.
Land, water, air, minerals, ecosystems, and human communities are all
cheap fodder for the energy machine. The single biggest form of
destruction in recent years is hydraulic fracturing as a method of
extracting natural gas in shale formations. This process is better known
as “fracking.”
In Pennsylvania’s rural, once farm-dominated Susquehanna County,
stalwart anti-fracking activist Vera Scroggins (2015) reports: “1300 gas
wells, 45 Gas Compressor Stations, hundreds of miles of high-pressure
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology682
gas lines just in my county of 800 sq. miles ... and still counting ...
over 1,000 DEP [Department of Environmental Protection] violations
racked up in my county by the seven gas companies ... since 2008”
(Scroggins 2015).
That is the experience of just one county. A 2013 review by the Wall
Street Journal of data covering 700 counties in 11 gas-producing states
found that at least 15.3 million Americans had a natural gas well within
one mile of their home, drilled since 2000. By 2012, people living and
working near fracked gas wells had filed over 1,000 complaints regard-
ing tainted water, severe illnesses, livestock deaths, and fish
kills (Guynup 2012; Valentine 2013; Center for Media and Democracy
2015).
Nonetheless, rural Americans have been able to organize and push
back against overweening private interests, though often only after
social and environmental damage has been done. The anti-fracking
movement has come too late for many rural residents of Colorado,
Wyoming, Texas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania (among other U.S. states and
countries), whose land, air, water, and health have been permanently
impacted by fracking, pipelines, and compressor stations. Hope for
others has been signaled by success in New York State, with a July 2014
high court ruling that small towns have the right to ban fracking, fol-
lowed by a December 2014 statewide ruling that prevents fracking in
New York State for the time being (Hoff2014; EarthJustice 2014).
A longer, wearier road to effective pushback is being traveled by resi-
dents of the central Appalachian Mountains of West Virginia and Ken-
tucky. Their land and water rights were pulled out from under them in
the years 1875–1910 by charming, unscrupulous landsmen, who
obtained signatures on broad form deeds that allowed complete
destruction of overlying land, water, homes, towns, and cemeteries in
order to extract the coal, oil, and gas beneath (Caudill [1963] 2001). By
the time federal environmental protection laws were passed inthe early
1970s and a measure of control was regained over the broad form deed
in 1988, Appalachia’s coal companies had over 50 years of doing what-
ever they wanted: the horse was long gone from the barn; and the
chickens were being guarded by foxes in Kentucky county offices, the
statehouse, and regulatory agencies (Brosiand Hardt 2005; Kentuckians
For The Commonwealth2005).
Whose Water Is It? 683

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT