Who Will Lead Us?: The Story of Five Hasidic Dynasties in America.

Author:Kaufman, Debra
Position:Book review
 
FREE EXCERPT

Who Will Lead Us?: The Story of Five Hasidic Dynasties in America. By Samuel C. Heilman. Oakland: University of California Press, 2017 xiii + 318 pp.

Even if one has no particular interest in Orthodox Judaism, whatever Samuel C. Heilman writes is of interest to Jewish studies scholars. At first, both the title and description of the stories of five Hasidic dynasties and their handling of succession problems seem somewhat esoteric, geared for an audience interested in the internecine dynamics of a few aberrant dynasties: Munkacs and Boyan/Kopyczynitz (with a leadership vacuum), Bobov and Satmar (with competing successors) and Chabad (with no successor). This seems especially true since the transition from one leader to the next in most Hasidic communities goes relatively smoothly. However, in the hands of a master storyteller and a keen observer of both time and context, Heilman creates a book that is anything but esoteric and one that is frankly quite absorbing. By focusing on the anomalies rather than the rule, we learn much about the fraught processes and the politics of ambition and competition that attend leadership transitions, religious or otherwise.

In the prologue, Heilman makes clear what his book is not: it is not about theology, or ideological arguments, or the teachings and writings of Hasidic rebbes, or the devotion of their followers. It is a socio-historical analysis of the patterns of contemporary Hasidic succession. In those same pages, he also makes clear the inherent difficulties of writing a book about a sacred community, which, despite its extraordinary status, presents the same ordinary conflicts that beset all studies that deal with biography, personality and history.

Heilman's initial discomfort is a part of the success of the book. He makes clear that despite his deep respect and regard for the Orthodox communities of which he writes, he is writing first and foremost as a social scientist, one who does his best to put his biases "on the shelf" and to maintain an "ethical neutrality" throughout the book (xvi). In his prologue, Heilman makes evident the ways in which the roles of researcher and Orthodox Jew may collide in the writing of his book, in which an analysis of succession may, by necessity, reveal the nitty-gritty and sometimes less than admirable processes that go into leadership transition. In part as a way of explaining why so many of his insider sources are anonymous and in part as a way of accounting for...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP