Was bids' farewell sad for taxpayers?

AuthorBrown, Kathy
PositionTar Heel Tattler - College contract system

In August, days before students were to report, N.C. Central University closed two of its newest dormitories. The culprit was a potentially toxic mold, also identified in 12 older buildings across campus. Estimated cost to remove it: $10.4 million.

The initial debate seemed simple: Was architect Harvey Gantt responsible for the problems with the two four-year-old dorms or did he get a bum rap? But bigger questions might have been lost in the shuffle. Namely, is there a flaw in the system under which Gantt Huberman Architects landed $1 million in NCCU contracts? And as the state plows $3.1 billion in bond money, approved in November 2000, into construction and renovation of public universities and colleges, is it going to bite officials again?

Gantt, a former Charlotte mayor and two-time Democratic U.S. Senate candidate, says his firm is not responsible for the mold problem. But the controversy focuses attention on a little-noticed provision of state law. Gantt Huberman did not have to bid on the $14 million dormitory project. The rule applies to any state-funded project. Engineers and architects are selected "on the basis of their demonstrated competencies and qualifications without regard to fee," says Speros...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT