Volatility measures as predictors of extreme returns

AuthorLorne N. Switzer,Yun Zhao,Cagdas Tahaoglu
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2017.04.001
Date01 November 2017
Published date01 November 2017
Volatility measures as predictors of extreme returns
Lorne N. Switzer , Cagdas Tahaoglu, Yun Zhao
John MolsonSchool of Business, ConcordiaUniversity, 1455 De MaisonneuveBlvd. W., Montréal,Québec H3G 1M8, Canada
abstractarticle info
Articlehistory:
Received1 December 2016
Accepted5 April 2017
Availableonline 7 April 2017
JEL classication:
G10
G11
G14
G17
This paper examinesthe relationship betweenvolatility and the probabilityof occurrence of expected extreme
returns in the Canadian market. Fourmeasures of volatility are examined: implied volatility from rm option
prices, conditional volatility calculated using an EGARCH model, idiosyncratic volatility, and expected shortfall. A
signicantly positive relationship is observed between a rm's idiosyncratic volatility and the probability of occur-
rence of an extreme return in the subsequent month for rms. A 10% increase in idiosyncratic volatility in a given
month is associated with the probability of an extreme shock in the subsequent month (top or bottom 1.5% of the
returns distribution) of 26.4%.Other rm characteristics, includingrm age, price, volume and book-to-market
ratio, are also shown to be signicantly relatedto subsequent rm extreme returns. The effects of conditional
and implied volatility are mixed. The E-GARCH and expected shortfallmeasures of conditional volatility are con-
sistentwith mean reversion:high shortterm realizationsof conditional vol atility foreshadow a lower probability
of extreme returns.
© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Extremereturns
Impliedvolatility
Conditionalvolatility
Idiosyncraticvolatility
Expectedshortfall
1. Introduction
The study of extreme returns has been of increased interest to re-
searchers and practitioners in recent years.Analyzing extreme returns
is important because of their potential to explain investor behavior. For
example, An (2016) nds that investors sell more when they have stocks
with both larger unrealized gains and larger unrealized losses. Since the
higher selling pressure of stocks with extreme returns leads to lower cur-
rent prices and higherfuture returns, such investor's trading behavior
can affect equilibrium price dynamics. Bali, Cakici, and Whitelaw
(2011) provide evidence indicatinga negative and signicant relation
between the maximum daily return over the past one month (MAX)
and expected stock returns. This result is consistent with under-diversi-
cation of portfolios and investor preferences for stocks with lottery like
payoffs. Longin (2000,2016) shows the importance of focusing on ex-
treme values for portfolio stress testing. Fodor, Krieger, Mauck, and
Peterson (2013) demonstrate that, in the U.S. market, when the ex
ante (predicted) extreme return stocks are removed from a portfolio,
the betas decrease and the overall portfolio performance improves.
Identifying and excluding predicting extremereturn rms is therefore
a challenge,but may be of great importance for investors. The purpose
of this study is to try to identify factors that may be helpful in predicting
extreme returns in the Canadian stock market.
Most extant work in this area looks at US markets. Fodor et al. (2013)
show a positive relationship between implied volatility and extreme
returns from option prices in the U.S. market. This study extends Fodor
et al. (2013) by looking at the extremereturn predictive ability of im-
plied volatility from option prices, as well as from conditional volatility
calculated from an EGARCH model, idiosyncratic volatility calculated by
using the Fama and French (2015) ve-factor model, and expected
shortfall.
Other explanatory factors,which are shown to have predictive abil-
ity for extremereturns in past research, are also included in this study.
These factorsinclude: rm size, book-to-marketratios, trading volume
and equity price.
This study focuses on rm data in the Canadian stockmarket from
2001 to 2014.Probit regressionmodels are estimatedto identify the re-
lationship between the probability of occurrence of expected extreme
returns and rm characteristics . The analyses are conducted for the
market as a whole, as well as forrms in the natural resource industry,
an importantsector for the Canadian economy,which has experienced
considerablevolatility in recent years.
Four volatility models are tested as predictorsof the probability of
extreme return behavior. The rst model uses implied volatility from
option prices. The second model uses conditional volatility from an
Reviewof Financial Economics35 (2017) 110
Finance Department, ConcordiaUniversity. Financial support from the Autorité des
MarchésFinanciers and the SSHRC to Switzeris gratefullyacknowledged. We would like
to thank the Editor, Gera ld Whitney, an anonymous re feree, Menachem Brenner ,
François Longin,and seminar participants at the 2016 IRMC conference in Jerusalem for
their valuablecomments and suggestions.
Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddress: lorne.switzer@concordia.ca(L.N. Switzer).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2017.04.001
1058-3300/©2017 Elsevier Inc. All rightsreserved.
Contents listsavailable at ScienceDirect
Review of Financial Economics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rfe

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT