Wifi in Utah: Legal and Social Issues
Publication year | 2007 |
Pages | 15 |
Vol. 20, No. 6, 15. WiFi in Utah: Legal and Social Issues
Utah Bar Journal
Vol. 20, No. 6
September/October 2007
Vol. 20, No. 6
September/October 2007
WiFi in Utah: Legal and Social Issues
WiFi in Utah: Legal and Social
Issues
by Cheryl B. Preston
All over Utah, parents are buying their children the tools
necessary to access astonishingly degrading and violent
sexually explicit materials. For instance, innocent looking
gaming systems, i.e., PlayStation Portable, X-Box
360, and Nintendo Wii, can access the internet and are
available everywhere from around $130 to $500. Many minors
also have internet enabled cell phones, PDAs, and
Blackberrys. Most of these systems do not come with a content
filter and cannot be modified by software to add any
protections
These tools, as well as laptop computers, can pick up
wireless internet signals in "hot spots" all over
Utah, including in Salt Lake City alone, Liberty Park, Main
Street, the library, and numerous cafes and restaurants.1
And, as more devices become available with internet access
capacity, more locations in Utah and around the country are
boasting of "free wireless access" provided by
governments, mall owners, and internet service providers who
enjoy the advertising and hope to lure free users to faster
paid programs. In Utah, hundreds of businesses from Logan to
St. George (and everywhere in between) provide free wireless
internet access,2 and proposals are in the works for more
including city-wide access. In addition, hundreds of homes in
Utah are set up with wireless routers. These electromagnetic
signals cannot be stopped at property lines, and when not
secured with a password or otherwise, they can be used by
anyone on the street or neighboring property.
Law enforcement agencies are trying to draw attention to the
risks of identity theft, invasion of privacy, and other
computer crimes perpetuated through the use of someone
else's unsecured wireless network.3 An often overlooked,
and more serious long term concern, is the risk of WiFi
hotspots is to the wellbeing of our youth.
Anyone familiar with the internet now knows that it has
become a marketing miracle for commercial pornographers and a
haven for sexual predators. The harm caused by internet
pornography is extensive and devastating. The FBI claims that
"[p]ornography is often used in the sexual victimization
of children."4 Pornography is an effective tool for
seduction because it "is used to lower the natural,
innate resistance of children to performing sexual acts, thus
functioning as a primer for child sexual abuse."5 One
recent study suggested a direct link between the use of
pornography and actual acts of sexual abuse against
children.6 It showed that as many as 85% of those convicted
for trafficking in child pornography admitted also to
inappropriately touching or raping children.7
The Harm that Comes from Unsecured Wireless
Connections
While the abilities to instant message and access information
on the internet are truly spectacular advancements with vast
educational, business, and inter-personal benefits, the world
wide web comes with real costs. In addition to the illegal
material, such as obscenity and pornography made using child
victims, millions of other websites are inappropriate for
minors even if currently legal.8 A court considering the
constitutionality of the federal Child Online Protection Act
recently estimated, "A little more than 1 percent of all
Web pages on the Surface Web (amounting to approximately 275
million to 700 million Web pages) are sexually
explicit."9
Parents and educators are becoming increasingly aware of
online pornography and are fighting back by installing
filters on home and school computers, establishing computer
use rules, and monitoring home computer use. Nevertheless,
few are aware of the extent to which the internet can be
freely accessed in other places and by other means, such as
through the neighbor's wireless network or at a shop.
Away from parental controls and without the filters or other
restrictions on their home and school computers, minors can
easily browse lurid obscenity that more than answers their
curiosity, be trapped in pornographic sites they didn't
intend to access, receive less-than-wholesome pictures from
friends and casual acquaintances (including those they met on
MySpace and FaceBook), and, with the help of a digital or
phone camera, send pictures parents might not even imagine
them capable of taking.
Moreover, free wireless internet access can actually assist
those who peddle child pornography, obscenity, and other
sexually explicit material. Service providers of free
wireless hot spots are not required to verify or retain
information, even if they require a log in name; anyone using
the wireless signal can view and trade illicit materials
without being traced. These free wireless hot spots provide
"unparalleled anonymity for traders of child
pornography."10
Socially Responsible Wireless Networks
Enabling ordinary protections on a wireless network is simple
and can be done by anyone who sets up such a system,
including individual users in homes. When a user sets up a
wireless router, the instructions typically ask the user if
he or she wishes to secure the network by password. Thus,
during the setup procedure for most routers, the user can
enable a password; then only those who are given the password
can log on to the internet service. In contrast to filters,
which require continual updates, the one-time password
protecting of wireless internet networks is easy and free.
Securing wireless networks is smart for other reasons. An
unsecured wireless network is a virtual invitation to
outsiders to intercept personal information, credit card
numbers, passwords and other communications sent over the
web. In addition, because online crimes, copyright
infringement, obscenity, child pornography, fraud, and other
illegal use of computers can be traced to particular
computers and networks, a wireless owner should be most
reluctant to have an unsecured network to which others can
gain access and use for illegal and inappropriate purposes.
A second choice for those deploying a wireless internet
connection is to install a filter that is reasonably
effective in restricting the availability of sexually
explicit content through the connection. Although filters are
not 100% effective, parents should be able to assume that
wireless networks are either secured or protected by filters
designed to protect minors.
Regulating Wireless Connections
We would like to believe that Utahns will soon become
sufficiently aware of the risks and sufficiently socially
responsible to secure or filter all wireless networks; but
that may not be true. The question then arises about how to
require those who choose to use wireless networks to take the
precautions necessary to protect children.
Existing Internet Pornography Laws
Currently, there are no enforceable federal laws punishing
the online posting or viewing of sexually explicit material
(outside of a public library that accepts federal funds)11
unless the material qualifies under the very limited and
strict Supreme Court definition of "obscenity"12 or
is pornography created using actual children.13 And, even so,
obscenity and child porn is easily accessible on the web
since enforcement efforts have not even begun to deter the
vast onslaught of such material.
Utah has statutes criminalizing the distribution of
pornography, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1204
(Supp. 2007), "dealing in materials harmful to
minors," Id.§ 76-10-1206 (Supp. 2007), and
posting pornography on the internet if the content provider
is domiciled in Utah, see id.§ 76-10-1233
(Supp. 2007). None of these statutes, however, regulate the
millions of pornographic websites that are posted by content
providers outside of Utah and, thus, have done little to stop
the inundation of sexually explicit material on the web.
One might argue that making an unsecured wireless network
available in Utah, especially to minors, is a form of
"distributing" pornography. Although most network
owners lack the requisite "intent" under the Utah
statutes, someone who intentionally provides to another
person, especially a minor, access to pornography on the
internet would presumably fall within the statutory language
These sections explicitly exempt "internet service
providers," but that term is defined to include only
those who provide internet access as a...
To continue reading
Request your trial