Vocational Evidence at Step Five of the Sequential Evaluation Process

AuthorDavid Traver
Pages73-127
17-1
Chapter Seventeen
Vocational Evidence at Step Five of
the Sequential Evaluation Process
§1700 Introduction
§1701 The Statutory Definition of “Disability”
§1702 The ALJ Cannot Use a VE to Beat the Medical-Vocational Guidelines
§1703 Inconsistency and the Medical-Vocational Guidelines
§1704 Key Concept: Nonexertional Impairments
§1705 The “Significant Numbers” Problem and the Medical-Vocational Guidelines
§1705.1 Structure of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines
§1706 Exertion and Full-Ranges of Work
§1707 Work Which Exists in Significant Numbers
§1708 Is a “Significant Number” of Jobs a Conceptual Definition?
§1708.1 “Significant Number” of Jobs as a Fact
§1708.2 “Significant Number” of Jobs and Age
§1709 The “Occupational Bases” Underlying the Medical-Vocational Rules
§1710 The Issue of Work Adjustment
§1711 “Work Which Exists in Significant Numbers” — The Two-Step Process Built Into the
Medical-Vocational Guidelines
§1711.1 “Work Which Exists in Significant Numbers” Example
§1711.2 “Work Which Exists in Significant Numbers” — Claimants With Transferable Skills
§1712 What Is This “Vocational Advantage” Bestowed by Transferable Skills?
§1713 Determining the Remaining Occupational Base — Five Rulings and a Regulation
§1713.1 The Regulation
§1713.2 Five Rulings
§1713.2.1 Case on Point: “Significant Number of Jobs” and the Grids
§1713.3 Fast and the Seventh Circuit’s Rejection of the Grids as a Framework for Solely
Nonexertional Limitations
Social Security Disability Advocate’s Handbook 17-74
§1714 Mastering the Technical Language of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines
§1714.1 Borderline-Age Situations and the Medical-Vocational Guidelines
§1714.2 Residual Functional Capacity (RFC)
§1714.3 Sedentary Work
§1714.4 Light Work
§1714.5 Medium Work
§1714.6 Heavy Work
§1714.7 Very Heavy Work
§1714.8 Age
§1714.8.1 An Important Proposed Regulation Regarding Age Categories Has Been Abandoned
by the Commissioner
§1714.9 Education
§1714.9.1 Inability to Communicate in English
§1714.9.2 Illiteracy
§1714.9.3 Marginal Education
§1714.9.4 Limited Education
§1714.10 High School Graduate or More — Does Not Provide for Direct Entry Into Skilled Work
§1714.11 High School Graduate or More — Provides for Direct Entry Into Skilled Work
§1714.12 Previous Work Experience
§1715 Using the Grid Rules to Direct a Finding of “Disabled” or “Not Disabled”
§1715.1 Social Security Ruling 83-11
§1715.2 Using the Grid Rules as a Framework for Evaluating Exertional Limitations Within a Range of
Work or Between Ranges of Work
§1716 Social Security Ruling 83-12
§1716.1 Applying the Medical-Vocational Rules as a Framework: SSR 83-12 Example
§1716.2 Social Security Ruling 83-12 — Summary
§1717 Social Security Ruling 83-14
§1717.1 Social Security Ruling 83-14 — Summary
§1718 Social Security Ruling 85-15
§1718.1 Social Security Ruling 85-15 — Summary
§1719 SSR 96-9p and the Occupational Base for Individuals Under Age 50
§1720 The Effect of Transferable Skills on the Occupational Bases
§1721 Transferable Skills for Individuals of Advanced Age — Equitable Considerations
§1722 Table of Occupational Base Sizes and its Relevance to “Advanced Age”
§1723 Taking This to the Hearing
§1724 The Framework of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines and Vocational Expert Cross-
Examination: Claimants Aged 50 and Older
§1725 The Framework of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines and Vocational Expert Cross-
Examination: Claimants Under Age 50
17-75 Introduction §1701
§1700 Introduction
The end-point of most disability claims that are
adjudicated at the Social Security Administration are
resolved for better or worse at step five of the sequen-
tial evaluation process.
Fortunately, step five offers the greatest oppor-
tunity to convince the Social Security Administration
that the claimant cannot work, and the claim should
be paid.
NOTE: This chapter is intended to be used in con-
junction with Chapter 18 — Transferability of Skills
Analysis.
§1701 The Statutory Definition
of “Disability”
The starting point for any discussion of step
five is the regulatory framework because step five
requires an amalgam of age, education, work ex-
perience, and residual functional capacity, which
all flow from the definition of disability. This
amalgam is presented in step-five adjudication in a
variety of complex ways.
The Social Security Act provides that certain
individuals who are “under a disability” shall receive
disability benefits. 42 U.S.C. § 423 (a)(1)(E) (2012).
Under the Act, “disability” is defined in terms of both
a medical element and a two-part vocational element.
Pursuant to the medical element, “disability” is de-
fined in the following general terms:
(d) Disability defined.
(1) The term “disability” means —
(A) inability to engage in any substan-
tial gainful activity by reason of any
medically determinable physical or
mental impairment which can be
expected to result in death or which
has lasted or can be expected to last
for a continuous period of not less
than 12 months; or
(B) in the case of an individual who has
attained the age of 55 and is blind
(within the meaning of “blindness”
as defined in section 216 (i)(1) [42
U.S.C. § 416 (i)(1)]), inability by
reason of such blindness to engage
in substantial gainful activity requir-
ing skills or abilities comparable
to those of any gainful activity in
which he has previously engaged
with some regularity and over a
substantial period of time.
42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(1)(A)-(B) (2012) Compare with
§ 1382c (a)(3)(A) (2011) (For SSI claims, note the
differences in the requirements regarding blindness
and age).
The Act elaborates upon the foregoing general
definition of “disability” by juxtaposing the medical
element upon the two-part vocational element, as
follows:
An individual shall be determined to
be under a disability only if his physical or
mental impairment or impairments are of
such severity that he is not only unable to do
his previous work but cannot, considering his
age, education, and work experience, en-
gage in any other kind of substantial gainful
work which exists in the national economy,
regardless of whether such work exists in the
immediate area in which he lives, or whether
a specific job vacancy exists for him, or
whether he would be hired if he applied for
work. For purposes of the preceding sentence
(with respect to any individual), “work which
exists in the national economy” means work
which exists in significant numbers either
in the region where such individual lives or
in several regions of the country.
42 U.S.C. §§ 423 (d)(2)(A); 1382c (a)(3)(B) (2012)
(emphases added).
Note that if alcoholism or drug addiction are ma-
terial to the finding of disability, the claimant is not
disabled. 20 C.F.R. § 404.321 (d)(2) (2012) and 20
C.F.R. § 404.1535 (2012). This is a but-for standard.
For example, it is difficult to imagine that alcoholism
would be material to a finding of disability in a case
in which the disabling impairments claimed flowed
from an industrial crushing injury of both legs result-
ing in amputation. It is therefore careful to consider
the context of the alcoholism or drug addiction within
the context of the case as a whole.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT