Violence against free media and knowledge dissemination in Ethiopia: an analysis of the mechanisms of restrictions on information flow.

Author:Dugo, Habtamu
Position:Report
 
FREE EXCERPT

Introduction

In the summer of 2014 Ethiopian government police, security forces and commando units shot live ammunitions into crowds of peaceful protesters killing at least 100 (OP, 2014). The protesters were opposed to a city planning scheme known as the Addis Ababa Integrated Development Master Plan (IDMP). By the time this plan was released, Addis Ababa's expansion had already displaced 150, 000 families of Oromo farmers and was set to displace millions more across Oromia (Legesse, 2014). (2)

Demonstrators demanded that the IDMP be halted immediately and the Oromo people's constitutional right to self-rule be respected. The Ethiopian government did not respond to the popular demands. Instead, authorities promised massive violence against civilians in an attempt to continue the implementation of the draconian plan (Biyyaa, 2014), characterized by the Oromo as "master killer."

In a compressive study released in 2014, Amnesty International (2014) reported that between 2011 and 2015, "at least 5000 Oromos have been arrested based on their actual or suspected peaceful opposition to the government." The popular understanding of the IDRP among the Oromo is that it will continue to uproot millions of Oromo farmers from their land and lead to the eventual splitting of Oromia into two halves--the east and the west. This will separate the Oromo people who share the same language, identity and a regional state from each other. Even families would be separated as they have been in North and South Korea.

None of the perpetrators of the April and May 2014 massacres were brought to justice nor was there an independent investigation into the mass killings by government security. Instead, some government officials such as Abay Tsehaye, the former Minister of Federal Affairs, threatened to take more actions against anyone who is opposed to the plan (OMN, 2014).

Oromia-wide protests against the IDMP recurred in mid-November 2015 in small town west of the capital city "when the government transferred the ownership of a school playground and a stadium to private investors, in addition to clearing the Chilimo natural forest to also make way for investors," (AI, 2015). In just over a few weeks, the protests spread to all parts of Oromia, involving people from all walks of life. The government responded with lethal force which resulted in the death of more than 200 people, including children, women and the elderly (HRLHA, 2015). Thousands of Oromos were wholesale labeled as "terrorists", giving a blank check to government officials and commanders of the security forces to act with impunity. Hundreds were killed, thousands maimed and several thousand imprisoned. The government placed a ban on domestic and international human rights organizations, media, journalists, bloggers and citizen journalists to cover up the use of lethal force to suppress the protests and the staggering number of casualties.

Human Rights Watch noted the government's tight chokehold on information as follows: "Ethiopia's pervasive restrictions on independent civil society and media mean that very little information is coming from affected areas although social media are filled with photos and videos of the protests," (HRW, 2016). This has left the global community in the dark about the real magnitude of the crimes security forces have committed. This paper analyzes the different facets of the Ethiopian government's restrictions on information flow focusing on actions taken during the Oromo protests of 2015-16.

I contend that the government's endeavors to create an information blackout was designed to avoid responsibility for the mass killings, maiming, detentions, rape and other crimes that the federal police, the Agazi Special Forces, and other state security units have committed against unarmed Oromo civilians. The study also reveals that the government has used a number of 'legal' and coercive strategies and tactics to exercise monopolistic control over information.

Disinformation

One of the ways in which the government uses to conceal its atrocities is the state-controlled media and crackdown on alternative media. With near monopoly on media outlets in the country, top government officials appear on state-controlled television (formerly ETV) and make statements that cannot stand to simply scrutiny. On December 15, 2015, for instance, Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn threatened to take "merciless actions" against Oromo protestors whom he labeled "terrorists," "anti-peace forces" and "destabilizing "forces". He indicated that the government's Anti-Terror Task Force will take swift measures to restore order. While the security forces have indeed carried out the orders, the purpose of the threats was to cow people into submission. In other words, the media is used to carry out disinformation battles that parallel the real actions.

The disinformation battle was mostly conducted by Getachew Reda, Ethiopia's Communication Minister and government spokesperson. He doubled down on the threat narrative initially issued by the prime minster and categorized the Oromo people in its entirety in non-human terms. He labeled the Oromo people as devils. "Oromo are forces of darkness invited by devil. These are demons requiring organized government actions to exterminate them. Since these devils are beyond the control of the witches that invited/charmed them, the only way we can "liki masgebat" (3) them is through organized government"

Coercive Strategies of Restrictions on Information Flow

Over the last quarter century, the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) has monopolized control over the media and telecommunications in Ethiopia. The ruling party also created a number of methods of restricting the flow of information. To restrict the free flow of information, the government has deployed major strategies and tactics, including passing a slew of draconian laws, killing, arresting and jailing journalists, bloggers, singers and artists, jamming diaspora-based satellite television stations, blocking diaspora-based online news outlets, limiting the penetration of the internet, violently cracking down on dissidents, and using foreign journalists unfamiliar with the local realities to misrepresent domestic conflicts and politics. (4) These are the general patterns of strategies and tactics the Ethiopian government employs to put stringent restrictions on the free flow of information. Unpacking these types of information control can help clarify why locals, the diaspora and the wider world are experiencing information blackout when it comes to massive atrocities committed by the Ethiopian government.

The Strategic Laws

This sub-section examines a slew of draconian laws that the Ethiopian government passed in order to restrict the free flow of information. What is referred to as "strategic laws" include the Mass Media and Freedom of Information Proclamation of 2008, the Anti-terrorism Proclamation of 2009, and the Charities and Societies Proclamation of 2009. These laws are some of the manifestations of the ruling EPRDF party's aggressive pursuit of power consolidation and authoritarian rule after potent challenge to the party at the polls in 2005. Arriola and Lyons (2016:77) succinctly describe the political context that gave rise to these legislations: "After the shock of the 2005 elections, in which opposition parties won nearly a third of parliamentary seats, the regime stepped up its efforts to harass opponents, using both legal and extralegal means." All the legislations discussed in this paper were born out of the ruling party's desire to stamp out criticism and opposition in order to dominate political power by preventing democratic transition (Dugo, 2012).

The government has a stranglehold on information flow using three recent laws. One of the earliest laws restricting citizens' right to impart and receive information was Ethiopia's "Mass Media and Freedom of Information Proclamation", which was conceived in the early 1990s and enacted as a legislation in July 2008 (Dugo, 2008; Ross 2010). This law has been used to silence criticism by incriminating journalists and media workers when they simply do their jobs. Watchdog groups and commentators agree that the media law violates international norms such as article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provides: "Everyone has...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP