Ziemba v. Armstrong.

• Position: MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER - Brief Article

U.S. District Court

CONFINEMENT

RESTRAINTS

DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE

Ziemba v. Armstrong, 343 F.Supp.2d 173 (D.Conn. 2004). A state inmate filed a civil rights action alleging that prison officials failed to provide constitutionally adequate health care, failed to protect him from the use of excessive force, and used excessive force. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants in part, and denied it in part. The district court held that fact issues remained as to whether a...