Using Body Worn Camera Footage to Investigate Predictors of Officer Behavior and the Outcomes of Police–Community Interactions
| Published date | 01 March 2024 |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/10986111231169788 |
| Author | Lois James,Stephen James |
| Date | 01 March 2024 |
| Subject Matter | Articles |
Article
Police Quarterly
2024, Vol. 27(1) 53–79
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/10986111231169788
journals.sagepub.com/home/pqx
Using Body Worn Camera
Footage to Investigate
Predictors of Officer Behavior
and the Outcomes of
Police–Community
Interactions
Lois James
1
and Stephen James
2
Abstract
The objective of this study was to use interval-level metrics to code a random sample of
body worn camera footage from a large (N∼700) municipal police department in
2019. Just over 1,100 videos were coded for (1) community member factors; (2) officer
behaviors—including an overall “performance”score; and (3) encounter outcomes.
Our goal was to answer the following: Do police receive higher overall performance
scores when interacting with some types of community members compared to others?
Which community member factors significantly predict specificofficer behaviors?
Which community member factors significantly predict encounter outcomes? We
found that officers received higher performance scores when interacting with women,
and with community members with mental illness. We found that socio-economic-
status and gender were the most common predictors of officer behaviors, while race
and ethnicity, socio-economic-status, gender, and armed status predicted encounter
outcomes. The policy implications of these findings are discussed.
1
Washington State University, College of Nursing, Health Sciences Campus, Spokane, WA, USA
2
Washington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Health Sciences Campus, Spokane, WA,
USA
Corresponding Author:
Lois James, Washington State University, College of Nursing, Health Sciences Campus, 412 E Spokane Falls
Blvd, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Email: lois_james@wsu.edu
Keywords
police behavior, body worn cameras, coding metrics, police-community relationships,
police legitimacy
Introduction
The question of what predicts how officers treat community members has long been
debated in the criminal justice literature (Crawford & Burns, 1998;Engel et al., 2000;
Hine et al., 2019;Lee, 2016;Madon & Murphy, 2021;Nix et al., 2017;Terrill& Reisi g,
2003). Most of this research has investigated how community member factors (e.g.,
race, socio-economic-status, demeanor), environmental factors (e.g., neighborhood
context, presence of weapons), or officer factors (e.g., race, gender, fatigue) influence
outcomes such as use of force, injuries, arrests, or community-member complaints. A
growing body of research however is examining predictors of officer performance or
behavior, for example whether officers are more inclined to use de-escalation, crisis
intervention, or procedural justice with some types of community members versus with
others (Broussard et al., 2010;James et al., 2018;Mazerolle et al., 2013). In the pursuit
of holding officers accountable, it is important to not just consider the outcomes of
police-community member encounters—which an officer may or may not have control
over—but to examine the specific things an officer did or said during the encounter.
Most of the prior research on what predicts both outcomes of police-community
member encounters or officers’actions within those encounters relies upon incident
report data (Gau et al., 2010;James et al., 2019;Lange et al., 2005), observations from
police ride alongs (Terrill & Reisig, 2003;Todak & James, 2018;Worden & McLean,
2014), or laboratory-based studies (Correll & Keesee, 2009;James et al., 2016). Each
of these data-collection methods offers advantages, however they suffer from potential
lack of contextual information (incident report data), substantial resources required,
observer effects (ride alongs), and limited real-world applicability (laboratory studies).
Body Worn Cameras (BWCs) provide an alternative approach for analyzing how police
perform during encounters with the public, as well as investigating what factors might
influence the outcomes of these encounters. Researchers are starting to take advantage
of BWC footage to assess officer behavior such as incivility (Holladay & Makin, 2021)
and adherence to procedural justice standards (Sytsma et al., 2021).
Although BWC footage offers a potentially rich data source for police researchers, it
is not without its limitations, and depends heavily on the coding tool by which to
“score”or “rate”officer behavior. One such tool was developed by Vila and colleagues
(2018). Our goal here was to use this tool to code BWC footage of police-community
interactions for three distinct groups of factors: community member facto rs, officer
behaviors (from which we calculated an overall “performance”score), and encounter
outcomes.
1
Before describing our methodology and results we provide a summary of
the research literature that has led to this point. This includes a brief review of: (1) the
findings on which community member factors (such as race, socio-economic-status, or
54 Police Quarterly 27(1)
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting