Urban Guerrilla Warfare.

• Author: Kreyche, Gerald F.
• Position: Book review

URBAN GUERRILLA WAFARE BY ANTHONY JAMES JOES THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY 2007, 222 PAGES, $22.95

Guerrilla warfare has had a long and checkered history. Generally, it involves a struggle of the weak against the strong, although compared to traditional military activity, it has its distinct advantages and its own tactics over a more powerful foe. Guerrillas have been known by various names, sometimes being called raiders, as was the case with John Mosby and William Quantrill in our own Civil War. Depending which side one is on, they are designated freedom fighters or terrorists. The common name for them in our Iraqi conflict is insurgents.

This study involves insurgencies in seven different parts of the world: Warsaw, 1944; Budapest, 1956; Algiers, 1957; Sao Paulo and Montevideo, 1965-73; Saigon, 1968; Northern Ireland, 1970-88; and Grozny, 1944-96. Author Anthony James Joes assesses the commonalities and differences in these and the reasons for their successes or failures. He claims that insurrectionists follow guidelines formulated by a number of historical experts, although these are not to be followed slavishly. Among the latter are Carl von Clausewitz as well as Mao Tse-tung, but guerrillas could have learned from Josip Tito and his Partisans, or Fidel Castro for that matter.

During the last 100 years, the world has changed, with many rural regions becoming virtually deserted and numerous cities now populated by millions. Thus, guerrilla warfare that formerly operated in remote areas today is played out on the urban stage. Accordingly, one witnesses new tactics such as road side bombs, employed with such effectiveness, for instance, in Iraq. The old strategies of surprise and ambush remain in force, though. The very mobility of insurgents is one of their strongest assets.

Urban guerrillas need outside help in financing and weapons procurement as well as inside intelligence. Also required is a base of operations, a sanctuary, and safe houses. The use of terrorism is common enough, but its danger lies in its backfiring, creating enemies among friends and supporters. To understand any guerrilla movement, one must context it within political dimensions.

The author's strong suit lies in the historical perspective he presents to each...