Unwanted cohabitation agreements
| Published date | 01 January 2023 |
| Author | Margaret Ryznar |
| Date | 01 January 2023 |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12687 |
SPECIAL FEATURE
Unwanted cohabitation agreements
Margaret Ryznar
†
Professor of Law, Indiana University
McKinney School of Law, Indianapolis,
Indiana, USA
Correspondence
Margaret Ryznar, Professor of Law, Indiana
University McKinney School of Law,
Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Email: mryznar@iu.edu
Abstract
Given the predominant role in American law of cohabita-
tion agreements in protecting cohabitants, this Article
presents an informal study that measured attitudes
toward such agreements. The results confirm the litera-
ture findings that people generally are not inclined to
want cohabitation agreements upon cohabitation. Further
studies might explore the reasons for the unpopularity of
cohabitation agreements and the ways to improve the
protection of cohabitants, and this Article offers potential
considerations.
KEYWORDS
cohabitation, cohabitation agreements, nonmarital contracts,
nonmarital relationships
Key points for the family court community
•The number of cohabitations has been increasing for
decades.
•The main source of legal protection for cohabitants upon
their separation is a cohabitation agreement.
•This small, informal study confirms the literature findings
that people generally are not inclined to want cohabita-
tion agreements upon cohabitation.
•Future studies might explore the reasons for the unpop-
ularity of cohabitation agreements and the ways to
improve the protection of cohabitants.
†
Professor of Law, Indiana University McKinney School of Law. Manythanks to the conveners and participants of the Roundtable on Nonmarriage and
the Law at Washington University School of Law in the Fall of 2021, especially Albertina Antognini, for their excellent comments on an earlier draft.
Thanks also to the editors of Family Court Review for their helpful edits.
DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12687
© 2022 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts.
Family Court Rev. 2023;61:73–80. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/fcre 73
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting