Understanding Saddam.

AuthorEisenstadt, Michael
PositionSaddam Hussein

THE RECENT reports of the Senate Intelligence Committee, the Iraq Survey Group, and the Presidential WMD Commission regarding intelligence and weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq offer many useful insights into Iraq's weapons programs and the challenges that the intelligence community faced in assessing them. But the reports offer no conclusive answer to a key question: How did Saddam Hussein plan to fight the war and avert defeat at the hands of the world's sole superpower without WMD? This is a troubling omission. After all, Saddam believed WMD to be the key to averting defeat during the Iran-Iraq War and to deterring the United States from "going on to Baghdad" after liberating Kuwait in 1991. If there was a time that Saddam needed WMD to fend off a threat to the very survival of his regime, it was in March 2003. This question must be answered if future WMD intelligence failures--in Iran, North Korea or elsewhere--are to be avoided.

It can now be said with confidence that on the eve of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Iraq did not possess militarily significant quantities of WMD. Moreover, there is no evidence that prior to the war Saddam Hussein gave any orders to resume production of chemical and biological weapons (CBW). One possible explanation for this is that Saddam feared the consequences of getting caught by United Nations weapons inspectors--who returned to Iraq in November 2002 and left Iraq the day before the war began on March 19, 2003--lest he undermine diplomatic efforts to avert war. An alternative explanation is that Saddam--worn down by more than a decade of sanctions and intermittent but wearying military confrontations with the United States--realized that the military balance did not favor Iraq and that his best chance for survival hinged upon the organization of a postwar insurgency that would return him to power. He therefore chose to focus his efforts in this direction, rather than resume Iraq's WMD programs. Support for such an explanation can be found in hints of fatalistic resignation discernible in some pre-war interviews with Saddam. Beyond this, evidence for such an explanation is rather thin.

Conversely, Saddam may have believed that he did not need CBW because the impending war did not threaten his grip on power. According to postwar debriefings of senior Iraqi military officers, Saddam believed that the United States planned a brief, punitive air campaign--essentially an expanded version of Operation Desert Fox (December 1998), perhaps in conjunction with limited ground operations to seize the oil fields in southern Iraq. (Saddam repeatedly claimed that control of Arab oil was a key U.S. objective.)

Moreover, in pre-war speeches and pep-talks with his generals, Saddam expressed his belief that Iraq could deal with a ground invasion. He apparently believed that the Iraqi army and the regime's popular militias would halt a foreign invasion far from the gates of Baghdad, while France or Russia would work for a ceasefire at the UN'. The use of CBW would have undercut wartime diplomacy and complicated postwar efforts to further undermine sanctions.

Finally, Saddam might also have concluded that CBW would not deter the United States from going to war. After all, it had not deterred the United States in 1991. He might have reasoned...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT