The two-state solution briefly considered.

AuthorCoon, Carlton S.

Text:

When it comes to debating Israel's policy towards the West Bank and Gaza, the subject of Hamas' refusal to recognize the Israeli state always pops right up. "Sure, but how can you negotiate with an organization that is dedicated to your destruction?" And so forth. The Hamas position, refusing to recognize the permanence of the Israeli state, is quoted in the compliant American press almost every time Hamas is mentioned, so that the casual reader has that idea inseparably associated with Hamas in his or her mind. That association is reinforced by official United States Government policy, which claims to base its exclusionary policy toward the Palestinians in large measure on that part of the Hamas platform.

Hamas, judging from my admittedly limited sources, is not willing to be coerced into backing very far away from that statement by present Israeli tactics of oppression. Hamas leaders evidently regard that position as one of the only two valid cards they hold in a very weak hand (the other being the threat of continuing the intifada). The Israelis hold just about every other card in the deck. Why, Hamas asks, should they give up either of those two cards in order to start a process of negotiation when they have no balancing concessions from the other side? How can they be sure that there will be any outcome other than total capitulation?

There is a certain symmetry here: Israelis don't trust Hamas because Hamas says it wants to get rid of Israel. Hamas doesn't trust Israel because it believes Israel really isn't interested in the so-called two state solution. Hamas believes the Israeli aim is not peace but the effective end of the Palestinian presence in the West Bank and Gaza. Hamas is convinced Israel wants it all, at least up to the Jordan, except perhaps for a few isolated "Bantustans" where a culturally and politically castrated remnant of the former Palestinian nation ekes out an existence as serfs under total Israeli control. It would be a mistake to consider either side entirely right. Israel has every right to mistrust a political organization that has done its best to spread terror and mayhem. But there is also something to be said for the Hamas view of Israeli intentions...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT