Two Methodologies for Predicting Patent Litigation Outcomes: Logistic Regression Versus Classification Trees

• Published date: 01 March 2016
• Date: 01 March 2016
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12075

Erratum

Two Methodologies for Predicting

Patent Litigation Outcomes: Logistic

Regression Versus Classification

Trees

In Tammy W. Cowart et al.,

1

an error was published in section VI,

“APPLICATION”.

The editors of the American Business Law Journal regret that an error

appeared on page 873 in issue 4 of volume 51. Although Lexis identi-

fies Mr. Elsberg as Samsung’s lead attorney pro hac vice in its publica-

tions of the January 9, 2014 and November 25, 2014 district court

decisions in this case, Mr. Elsberg has informed the authors he was not,

in fact, lead trial attorney.

We apologize for any misunderstanding.

1

Tammy W. Cowart et al., Two Methodologies for Predicting Patent Litigation Outcomes: Logistic

Regression Versus Classification Trees,51Am. Bus. L. J. 843, 873 & n. 134 (2014), DOI:

10.1111/ablj.12036.

V

C2016 The Authors

American Business Law Journal V

C2016 Academy of Legal Studies in Business

193

American Business Law Journal

Volume 53, Issue 1, 193, Spring 2016

bs_bs_banner