A triangular purchasing power parity hypothesis: A rejoinder

Published date01 March 2021
AuthorPeijie Wang,Zhiyuan Liu
Date01 March 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13089
World Econ. 2021;44:849–854.
|
849
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/twec
Received: 17 November 2020
|
Accepted: 4 January 2021
DOI: 10.1111/twec.13089
INVITED REVIEW
A triangular purchasing power parity hypothesis: A
rejoinder
PeijieWang1,2
|
ZhiyuanLiu3
1Plymouth Business School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
2Institute of World Economy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
3Department of International Economics and Trade, Business School, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing,
China
We are delighted to see Dr Alan King's (King A, 2021, AK thereafter) interest and curiosity in the
subject of PPP and, in particular, this paper of ours (Wang & Liu,2018). AK spends the first half of
his paper going though and explaining our paper. So, we jump to and start with his critique of the
triangular PPP hypothesis where he raises three points.
1
|
3(i)
The first argument of AK is that ‘aspects of its theoretical framework are either implausible, incon-
sistent or incomplete’. This strong statement is based on somewhat perplexed misunderstandings, the
three important assumptions AK assumes we make. The argument seems to be based on incomplete
information too. There are five, instead of three, equations for introducing GT PPP, and equation (3)
is interim to reach equation (5). Our explanation and discussion start below equation (5):
The above relationship tells that inflation in the Euroland would be influenced more by
the inflation of the economies that possess greater gravity and momentum, and by the
changes in the exchange rates between the euro and the currencies that possess greater
gravity and momentum. The influence of small economies is negligible. Similarly, this
notion applies to the US dollar, the RMB and other currencies
(p. 3,075).
While AK interprets:
The first is that small economies have a negligible role to play in the GT PPP relation-
ship. This assumption is plausible in relation to an individual small economy. For exam-
ple, goods produced in Chile account for a tiny share of Euroland's consumption bundle
and so, naturally, inflation in Chile and fluctuations in the value of its peso against the
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2021 The Authors. The World Economy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT