Transgender Family Law

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12357
Published date01 July 2018
Date01 July 2018
AuthorShannon Price Minter
TRANSGENDER FAMILY LAW
Shannon Price Minter
Transgender people face unique issues in parentage, custody, and divorce cases. Many transgender people are raising children
or wish to do so. This article examines the main legal issues facing transgender people who become parents by giving birth
or impregnating a partner, through assisted reproduction, through marriage, by raising a child, or through adoption. In the
past, some courts viewed a parents gender transition as a sufcient reason to terminate parental rights. Today, the law has
shifted to provide much more security for transgender parents, though signicant bias still remains, particularly in divorce
and child custody cases. In addition, many states have not yet fully addressed how to determine the legal parentage of chil-
dren born through assisted reproduction. I analyze the legal landscape for transgender parents and spouses and offer critical
suggestions to ensure that transgender people are able to protect their families and their parental rights.
Key Points for the Family Court Community:
There is no evidence that a persons transgender status affects his/her ability to be a good parent.
A transgender person may become a parent by giving birth or impregnating a partner, through assisted reproduction,
through marriage, by raising a child, or through adoption.
Increasingly, transgender people are counseled about their ability to preserve their reproductive capacity by preserving
either sperm or eggs before undergoing medical treatments for gender transition.
Many transgender people use assisted reproduction to have children.
The use of surrogacy is especially important for some transgender women who are partnered with or married to a man.
Transgender people who wish to use surrogacy to have a child should understand the law in their state and followany
legal requirements to ensure that surrogacy agreements will be upheld.
For all transgender parents using assisted reproduction, it is important to enter into a written agreement with the other
parent, if any, and with the donor or surrogate, if any, and to sign medical or legal consent forms recognizing their
intent to be a parent.
Transgender parents still face considerable bias in child custody cases.
Even in our modern era of no-fault divorce, a court may view a transgender spouse as culpable simply for coming out
as a transgender person and that perception may lead to serious adverse consequences in the divorce.
Many judges continue to view a spouses decision to undergo a gender transition as a legitimate reason to award the
other spouse more marital property or spousal support.
Courts also frequently disregard the negative economic impact of transitioning for many transgender people, ordering
a transgender parent or spouse to pay support based on their pretransition income rather than their cur rent earning
power, which may be greatly reduced.
Alternative dispute resolution may be particularly benecial for transgender clients.
As a result of the Supreme Courts ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, transgender spouses no longer must fear that their
marriages may be nullied by a court or that their parental rights may be stripped away.
Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution; Assisted Reproduction; Bias; Child Custody; Divorce; Gender Dysphoria;
Obergefell; Surrogacy; and Transgender.
Transgender people have made remarkable legal and social progress in the past two decades. For
the rst time in our nations history, our most important social institutionsfrom schools to prisons
to workplaces to the U.S. militaryare grappling with how to acknowledge and include transgender
individuals. Transgender people are increasingly active and visible in every segment of society:
teaching, running for ofce, serving as judges, competing as Olympic athletes, and starring in
movies and on television. From small towns to our nations capital, transgender advocates have
created a vocal social movement for inclusion, acceptance, and legal equality.
Correspondence: sminter@nclrights.org
FAMILY COURT REVIEW, Vol. 56 No. 3, July 2018 410422
© 2018 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT