Towards the circular economy: A commentary on corporate approaches and challenges
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1680 |
Published date | 01 November 2017 |
Date | 01 November 2017 |
COMMENTARY
Towards the circular economy: A commentary on corporate
approaches and challenges
Peter Jones |Daphne Comfort
The Business School, University of
Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, UK,
GL50 2RH
Correspondence
Peter Jones, The Business School, University of
Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, UK
GL50 2RH.
Email: pjones@glos.ac.uk
Abstract
The concept of the circular economy is gaining momentum within the business world, and it is
seen as an important element in the transition to a more sustainable future. Circular econo-
mies are built around a range of activities that look to reduce the demand for raw material
inputs and natural resources and to recover, recycle, and reuse those inputs and resources
as an integral part of the production process. As such, the concept of the circular economy
restorative and regenerative and is contrasted, by its proponents, with the traditional “linear
economy”that turns raw materials into waste in the production process and that is seen to
lead to environmental pollution and the removal of natural capital from the environment. This
commentary paper outlines the characteristic features of the concept of the circular economy,
outlines how a number of companies are adopting circular economy approaches, and offers
some general reflections on the application of the concept.
1|INTRODUCTION
A growing number of organisations and companies claim to be
promoting the concept of the circular economy as an important
element in the transition to a more sustainable future. The European
Commission (2015), for example, argued that “the transition to a
more circular economy, where the value of products, materials and
resources is maintained in the economy for as long as possible, and
the generation of waste is minimised, is an essential contribution
to the European Union's efforts to develop a sustainable, low carbon,
resource efficient and competitive economy.”In launching A Circular
Economic Strategy for Scotland, Richard Lockhead, the then Cabinet
Secretary for Rural Affairs, Food and Environment, emphasised
that “the circular economy offers a new and exciting perspective”
that is “about the environment, the economy, and people”and that
“above all it is about the moral imperative to reduce our demand
on the planet's resources”(Natural Scotland 2016). From a commer-
cial perspective, Coca Cola (2017), the multinational beverage corpo-
ration, reported, “our long term vision is to leverage our significant
scale and resources to contribute meaningfully to the circular econ-
omy where materials are recycled and reused for as long as possible
to ensure maximum value is gained from them.”UPM‐Kymmene
(2017), one of the largest companies within the European forest,
paper, and packaging industry, claimed that “the circular economy
is seen as the way to secure a sustainable future and to enable
businesses and societies to succeed.”More generally, the World
Business Council for Sustainable Development (2017) claimed that
“by moving towards the circular economy, countries and companies
can capture increased growth; innovation and competitive advantage
while enjoying cost savings; reductions in energy use and CO2
emissions, as well as better supply chain and resource security.”
The corporate enthusiasm for a circular business model seems to
be clearly rooted in the belief that sustainable development will
increasingly become a mainstream priority for many markets. Under
the headline “Rising to the Challenge,”PricewaterhouseCoopers
(2017a) claimed, “the circular economy is here to stay”and the
company also argued that the circular economy “opens up opportuni-
ties for companies to build competitive advantage, create new profit
pools, develop resilience and provide solutions to some of the most
important issues facing business today”(PricewaterhouseCoopers
2017b). However, the transition towards a circular economy, and the
opportunities it may bring, presents a major challenge for businesses,
consumers, and governments. Accenture Strategy (2015), for example,
suggested “transitioning to the circular economy may be the biggest
revolution and opportunity for how we organize production and
consumption in our global economy”and that “at its essence, the
circular economy represents a new way of looking at the relationships
between markets, customers and natural resources.”In a similar vein,
Bjorn Delbeecke (2016), writing under the European Public Affairs
banner, described the transition to a circular economy as a “paradigm
shift”and that such a shift requires “not only the revaluation of
business models and industrial policies, but of established consumer
DOI: 10.1002/pa.1680
J Public Affairs. 2017;17:e1680.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1680
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa 1of5
To continue reading
Request your trial