Topical index

• Date: 01 March 2009

39 ELR 10266 ENVIRO NMENTAL LAW REPORT ER 3-2009

CALIFO RNIA

• Civil procedure

San Diego Unied Sch. Dist. v. San Diego, County of

(Cal. App. 4th Dist.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20014

• Constitutional law

Eder v. California Dep’t of Fish & Game (Cal. App.

1st Dist.) ...................................20013

• Hazardous wastes & substances

People v. Roscoe (Cal. App. 3d Dist.) . . . . . . . . . . . . .20004

State v. California Continental Ins. Co. (Cal. App. 4th

Dist.) ......................................20010

• Insurance law

State v. California Continental Ins. Co. (Cal. App. 4th

Dist.) ......................................20010

• Proposition 65

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Oce of Envtl. Health Hazard

Assessment (Cal. App. 2d Dist.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20007

• Tort law

Birke v. Oakwood Worldwide (Cal. App. 2d Dist.) . . .20008

Paduano v. American Honda Co. (Cal. App. 4t h

Dist.) ....................................20009

CIVIL PR OCEDURE

• Class actions, FRCP 23

Freeman v. Blue Ridge Paper Prods., Inc. (6th Cir.) . . .20003

• Statute of limitations

Comment: McDonald v. Sun Oil: e Ninth

Circuit’s Constitutionally Questionable Expansion of

CERCLA’s Toxic Tor t Discovery Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . .10197

CLEAN AI R ACT

• Preemption

Middlesex County Health Dep’t v. Consolidated Rail

Corp. (D.N.J.) ...............................20016

CLIMATE CHAN GE

Article: Getting Back to Basics: Why Nuisance Claims

Are of Limited Value in Shifting the Costs of Climate

Change ....................................10218

Article: Global Warming: e Ultimate Public

Nuisance ...................................10230

COLORADO

• Land use

Colorado Mining Ass’n v. Board of County Comm’rs

of Summit County (Colo.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20017

COMPREHE NSIVE ENVIRO NMENTAL RESPON SE,

COMPENSATION, AND LIABILI TY ACT

• Contribution

Comment: McDonald v. Sun Oil: e Ninth

Circuit’s Constitutionally Questionable Expansion of

CERCLA’s Toxic Tor t Discovery Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . .10197

CORPORATE LAW

• Corporate ocer liability

People v. Roscoe (Cal. App. 3d Dist.) . . . . . . . . . . . . .20004

COURTS

• Standing to sue

Coalition of Watershed Towns v. EPA (2d Cir.) . . . . . .20002

ENVIRON MENTAL JUSTICE

Dialogue: Equal Protection, Strict Scrutiny, and

Actions to Promote Environmental Justice . . . . . . . . . .10201

ENVIRON MENTAL LAW AND POLI CY, GENERA L

Comment: Wasting Away: Why Federal

Environmental Statutes Are Currently Unable to

Regulate Radio Frequency Identication Chip

Disposal and Prevent Widespread Environmental

Harm. .....................................10186

EVIDEN CE, RULES OF

• Testimony by experts

Miller v. Mandrin Homes, Ltd. (4th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . .20011

FEDERA L POWER ACT

• Permits and licensing, §4(e)

FPL Energy Me. Hydro Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Federal

Energy Regulatory Comm’n (1st Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . .20001

FEDERA L WATER POLLUTI ON CONTROL ACT

• Attorneys fees

Environmental Conservation Org v. Dallas, City of

(5th Cir.) ...................................20005

• Dredge and ll, §404

Article: e ECOS Proposal for Expanded State

Assumption of the CWA §404 Program:

Unnecessary, Unwise, and Unworkable . . . . . . . . . . . .10209

• Enforcement

United States v. Hagerman (7th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20012

• National pollutant discharge elimination system

permit program, §402

Comment: Clean Water Act NPDES Water Transfer

Issue: e Implications for the Water Supply and

Water User Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10181

National Cotton Council of Am. v. EPA (6th Cir.) . . .20006

NEW JER SEY

• Air pollution

Middlesex County Health Dep’t v. Consolidated Rail

Corp. (D.N.J.) ...............................20016

PUBLIC L ANDS

• BLM lands

Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Allred

(D.D.C.) .................................20018

TOPICAL INDEX