Topical index

• Date: 01 December 2010

12-2010 NEWS & ANALYSIS 40 ELR 11267

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

• Notice-and-comment requirements

New Hope Power Co. v. Corps of Eng’rs

(S.D. Fla.) .................................20259

CALIFORNIA

• California Environmental Quality Act

Tomlinson v. Alameda, County of (Cal. App. 1st) . . .20263

CIVIL PROCEDURE

• Consolidation, FRCP 42

Sierra Club v. Elk Run Coal Co. (S.D. W. Va.) . . . . .20265

• Removal

Agee v. Monsanto Co. (S.D. W. Va.) . . . . . . . . . . . . .20264

In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”

(E.D. La.) .................................20267

CLEAN AIR ACT

• Enforcement, §113

United States v. Cinergy Corp. (7th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . 20266

• “Modication” construed

United States v. Cinergy Corp. (7th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . 20266

CLIMATE CHANGE

Article: e Political Question Doctrine’s Role in

Climate Change Nuisance Litigation: Are Power

Utilities the First of Many Casualties?. . . . . . . . . . . . .11229

Article: How to Take Climate Change Into Account:

A Guidance Document for Judges Adjudicating

Water Disputes .............................11215

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE,

COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT

• Contribution

Comment: Unresolved CERCLA Issues After

Atlantic Research and Burlington Northern .........11198

• Liability, §107

Palmtree Acquisition Corp. v. Neely (N.D. Cal.) . . . .20271

Comment: Unresolved CERCLA Issues After

Atlantic Research and Burlington Northern .........11198

• Oversight costs

United States v. Rohm & Haas Co. (D.N.J.) . . . . . . .20260

COURTS

• Jurisdiction

Agee v. Monsanto Co. (S.D. W. Va.) . . . . . . . . . . . . .20264

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

• Determination of endangered and threatened species, §4

Wildearth Guardians v. Salazar (D. Ariz.). . . . . . . . . .20272

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, GENERAL

Comment: Environmental Risks of Acquiring

Property by Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11211

FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT

• Dredge and ll, §404

Article: Rapanos v. United States: Searching for a

Signicant Nexus Using Proximate Causation and

Foreseeability Principles .......................11242

INSURANCE

• Duty to defend

Ash Grove Cement Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

(D. Or.) ...................................20269

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT

• Generally

Dialogue: e National Environmental Policy Act

40th Anniversar y Symposium. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11183

NEW JERSEY

• Water pollution

IFMC Corp. v. American Cyanamid (D.N.J.) . . . . . .20268

PROPERTY

• Forfeiture

Comment: Environmental Risks of Acquiring

Property by Foreclosure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11211

PUBLIC LANDS

• Huron-Manistee National Forest, Mich.

Meister v. Department of Agric. (6th Cir.) . . . . . . . . .20258

RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT

• Citizen suits, §7002

Sánchez v. Esso Standard Oil de Puerto Rico, Inc.

(D.P.R.) ...................................20270

• Enforcement

Sánchez v. Esso Standard Oil de Puerto Rico, Inc.

(D.P.R.) .................................. 20270

• Underground storage tanks

Sánchez v. Esso Standard Oil de Puerto Rico, Inc.

(D.P.R.) .................................. 20270

TEXAS

• Concentrated animal feeding operations

Waco, City of v. Texas Comm’n on Envtl. Quality

(Tex. App.) ................................20261

TORTS

• Causation, proof of

Article: Rapanos v. United States: Searching for a

Signicant Nexus Using Proximate Causation and

Foreseeability Principles .................... . . 11242

• Nuisance

Article: e Political Question Doctrine’s Role in

Climate Change Nuisance Litigation: Are Power

Utilities the First of Many Casualties?. . . . . . . . . . . . .11229

TOPICAL INDEX

Copyright © 2010 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120.