Topical Index

• Date: 01 March 2011

41 ELR 10294 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REPORTER 3-2011

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

• “Final agency action” construed

National Mining Ass’n v. Jackson (D.D.C.) . . . . . . 20066

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

• “Final agency action” construed

National Mining Ass’n v. Jackson (D.D.C.) . . . . . . 20066

CIVIL PROCEDURE

• Class actions, FRCP 23

Mays v. Tennessee Valley Auth. (E.D. Tenn.) . . . . . 20075

• Intervention, FRCP 24

Wilderness Soc’y v. U.S. Forest Serv. (9th Cir.) . . . 20062

CLEAN AIR ACT

• Hazardous air pollutants, §112

Sierra Club v. Jackson (D.D.C.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20067

CLIMATE CHANGE

Comment: NEPA and Assessment of Greenhouse

Gas Emissions ............................10197

Article: e Future of the Greenhouse Gas

Tailoring Rule ............................10247

Comment: e Outer Limits of Endangered Species

Act Liability—e ESA’s Indirect Eect Regulation

and Its Application to Climate Change ..........10204

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE,

COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT

• National Priorities List

U.S. Magnesium, LLM v. EPA (D.C. Cir.) . . . . . . 20064

• Response costs

Litgo New Jersey, Inc. v. Martin (D.N.J.) . . . . . . . 20068

COURTS

• Jurisdiction

United States v. Canal Barge Co. (6th Cir.) . . . . . . 20065

• Ripeness

National Mining Ass’n v. Jackson (D.D.C.) . . . . . . 20066

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

Comment: e Outer Limits of Endangered Species

Act Liability—e ESA’s Indirect Eect Regulation

and Its Application to Climate Change . . . . . . . . . . 10204

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY,

GENERAL

Comment: Environmental Law Goes Global:

Taking Back Eden: Eight Environmental Cases at

Changed the World, by Oliver A. Houck . . . . . . . . . 10194

Dialogue: e “Perfect Storm” for Renewable

Energy: Policy Drivers and Decisionmaking. . . . . . 10179

FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT

• Corps of Engineers jurisdiction

Precon Dev. Corp. v. Corps of Eng’rs (4th Cir.) . . . 20071

• Enforcement

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Gaston Copper

Recycling Corp. (4th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20055

• National pollutant discharge elimination system

permit program, §402

Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. Aurora

Energy Servs. LLC (D. Alaska) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20072

• State certication, §401

Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. Lewis (9th Cir.) . . 20059

• Total maximum daily loads, §303(d)

Article: e Clean Water Act Returns (Again): Part

I, TMDLs and the Chesapeake Bay ............ 10208

INTERNATIONAL LAW

• China

Article: How Do Clean Development Mechanism

Projects Contribute to Sustainable Development in

China: An Assessment of the Performance of the

CDM in China ...........................10260

MARYLAND

• Water pollution

In re Chaney Enters. Ltd. (Md. Cir. Ct.) . . . . . . . . 20070

MICHIGAN

• Environmental Response Act

Anglers of the AuSable, Inc. v. Department of

Envtl. Quality (Mich.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20056

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT

• Judicial review

Wilderness Soc’y v. U.S. Forest Serv. (9th Cir.) . . . 20062

• National forests

Lands Council v. McNair (9th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . 20057

NATIONAL FOREST MANAGEMENT ACT

• National forests

Lands Council v. McNair (9th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . 20057

NATURAL GAS ACT

• Procedure

Murray Energy Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory

Comm’n (D.C. Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20069

NEW JERSEY

• New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act

Litgo New Jersey, Inc. v. Martin (D.N.J.) . . . . . . . 20068

NUCLEAR WASTE

• Facility decommissioning

Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v. NRC (D.C. Cir.) . . . . . . . . 20060

TOPICAL INDEX

Copyright © 2011 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120.