Topical Index

• Date: 01 April 2011

41 ELR 10394 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REPORTER 4-2011

CALIFORNIA

• California Environmental Quality Act

Association of Irritated Residents v. California Air

Resources Bd. (Cal. Super. Ct.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20080

• Water rights

Klamath Irrigation Dist. v. United States

(Fed. Cir.) ............................. 20094

CIVIL PROCEDURE

• Civil procedure

Texas v. EPA (5th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20100

• Discovery

In re Chevron Corp. (3d Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20087

• Venue

Human v. EPA (S.D. W. Va.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20086

CLEAN AIR ACT

• Judicial review

Ocean County Landll Corp. v. EPA (3d Cir.) . . . 20079

• New source performance standards, §111

Dialogue: New Source Performance Standards for

Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions From the Power

and Rening Sectors: Wrong Mechanism at the

Wrong Time .............................10312

Dialogue: e Clean Air Act: A Suitable Tool for

Addressing the Challenges of Climate Change . . . 10301

• State implementation plans

Association of Irritated Residents v. EPA

(9th Cir.) .............................. 20082

Texas v. EPA (5th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20100

CLIMATE CHANGE

Association of Irritated Residents v. California Air

Resources Bd. (Cal. Super. Ct.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20080

Comment: Easier Said an Done: Displacing

Public Nuisance When States Sue for Climate

Change Damages ..........................10316

Article: State and Regional Control of Geological

Carbon Sequestration (Part 1) ................ 10348

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE,

COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT

• Response costs

500 Assocs., Inc. v. Vermont Am. Corp.

(W.D. Ky.) ............................. 20097

CONNECTICUT

• Wetlands

Goodspeed Airport LLC v. East Haddam Inland

Wetlands & Watercourses Comm’n (2d Cir.) . . . . . 20095

COURTS

• Abstention

Chico Serv. Station, Inc. v. Sol Puerto Rico Ltd.

(1st Cir.) ................................20083

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

• Biological opinion, §7(b)

Jayne v. Rey (D. Idaho) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20076

• Prohibited acts, §9

Northern Cal. River Watch v. Wilcox (9th Cir.) . . . 20084

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, GENERAL

Article: Everyday Environmentalism: Concerning

Consumption ............................10374

Article: Earmarking for Environmental Damage:

From Oil Spills to Climate Change ............10334

Article: State and Regional Control of Geological

Carbon Sequestration (Part 1) ................ 10348

FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT

• Dredge and ll, §404

Human v. EPA (S.D. W. Va.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20086

• National pollutant discharge elimination system

permit program, §402

Ecological Rights Found. v. Pacic Gas & Elec.

Co. (N.D. Cal.) ...........................20089

• Standing

Barnum Timber Co. v. EPA (9th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . 20088

• Water quality standards, §303

Barnum Timber Co. v. EPA (9th Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . 20088

IDAHO

• National forests

Jayne v. Rey (D. Idaho) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20076

INJUNCTIONS

• Permanent

Ensco Oshore Co. v. Salazar (E.D. La.) . . . . . . . . 20092

INSURANCE

• Duty to indemnify

Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Goodyear Tire &

Rubber Co. (N.D. Ohio) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20099

INTERNATIONAL LAW

• Middle East

Comment: e Pakistan Supreme Court’s Use of

Suo-Motu Actions in Environmental Cases . . . . . . 10326

• South America

In re Chevron Corp. (3d Cir.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20087

TOPICAL INDEX

Copyright © 2011 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120.