To stay or go: Relationship dissolution and repartnering after paternal incarceration

Published date01 July 2022
AuthorAllison Dwyer Emory
Date01 July 2022
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12657
RESEARCH
To stay or go: Relationship dissolution and
repartnering after paternal incarceration
Allison Dwyer Emory
Department of Sociology, University at
Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, United States
Correspondence
Allison Dwyer Emory, Department of
Sociology, University at Buffalo, 430 Park
Hall, Buffalo NY 14260-4140, USA.
Email: ademory@buffalo.edu
Funding information
This research was funded in part by a Family
Strengthening Scholars Grant (#90PD0293)
from the Office of Planning, Research and
Evaluation, Administration for Children and
Families, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The contents are solely the
responsibility of the author and do not
necessarily represent the official views of the
Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation,
the Administration for Children and Families,
or the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. Support for the Fragile Families and
Child Wellbeing study was provided by the
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development
through grants R01HD36916, R01HD39135,
and R01HD40421, as well as a consortium of
private foundations, but no direct support was
provided from these grants for the present
study.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated how relationship disso-
lution and repartnering shape womens relationship qual-
ity after their partners incarceration and evaluates
whether incarceration is a unique context for relationship
transitions.
Background: Millions of couples in the United States face
incarceration each year, and many relationships do not
survive the experience. Although these breakups are typi-
cally framed as negative events, it is unclear whether rela-
tionship dissolution harms or helps women navigating the
incarceration of their partner or coparent.
Method: Using longitudinal data from the Fragile Families
study, this article contrasts the experiences of women who
stayed with their childs father through his incarceration,
those who separated and remained single, and those who
separated and repartnered. Three domains of relationship
quality were considered: cooperativeness of parenting rela-
tionships, supportiveness of romantic relationships, and
risk of domestic violence.
Results: Data reveal that most relationships end, creating
an opportunity for mothers to form stronger relationships
with more advantaged new partners. Incarceration also
provides a distinct context for repartnering, amplifying
both the advantages and disadvantages of dissolution.
Conclusion: Most couples experiencing paternal incarcera-
tion will also navigate relationship dissolution, and many
will integrate a new partner into the family. For many
women, particularly those whose relationships have
become violent, these transitions may be sources of resil-
ience rather than hardship.
Implications: Rather than a proscriptive focus on preserv-
ing families, these findings highlight the need to support
families simultaneously navigating incarceration and
changing family roles.
Received: 15 October 2020Revised: 24 May 2021Accepted: 9 September 2021
DOI: 10.1111/fare.12657
© 2022 National Council on Family Relations.
Family Relations. 2022;71:11911210. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/fare 1191
Nineteen percent of women in the United States have experienced the incarceration of a roman-
tic partner or coparent (Enns et al., 2019), with serious implications for family relationships.
The strain associated with a partners incarceration is high, particularly if the couple shared
children or coresided, and these relationships are at particularly high risk of ending
(Turney, 2015a). Relationship dissolution is often framed as a negative outcome, reflecting the
importance of these relationships for incarcerated mens ongoing involvement with their chil-
dren and successful reentry back into their communities (Geller, 2013; Visher & Travis, 2003).
It is less clear that ending a relationship with an incarcerated man is consistently detrimental
for their partners, however. It is well documented that incarceration can damage and strain
relationships (Comfort, 2008; Turney, 2015a,2015b; Turney & Wildeman, 2013; Western
et al., 2004), but few studies have considered how this strain restructures the trade-offs associ-
ated with relationship dissolution and repartnering after a partners incarceration.
This study posed two research questions about incarceration-related relationship dissolution
for women who were romantically involved and shared a child with an incarcerated man. First,
how do the romantic and parenting relationships of women who remain with their partner
through his incarceration compare to those of women whose relationships ended and either
remained single or repartnered? The quality of womens relationships with both their childs
father and their new partner was considered across three domains: degree of cooperation in par-
enting relationships, degree of emotional support in romantic relationships, and recent exposure
to domestic violence. Second, is incarceration a unique context for relationship dissolution and
repartnering? This question was addressed by contrasting the experiences of mothers who made
similar relationship transitions but whose partners were not incarcerated. Analyses used data
from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCW), which provided rich longitudi-
nal data on relationships and partner incarceration among the families most vulnerable to crim-
inal justice contact. This article provides a new lens for understanding how women navigate a
partners incarceration by modeling both the full set of possible relationship transitions and the
role incarceration plays in shaping the outcomes associated with these decisions.
BACKGROUND
Reflecting concerns about the collateral consequences of incarceration and family instability
more broadly, relationship dissolution among families experiencing paternal incarceration is
often framed as a negative outcome. For currently and recently incarcerated men, this percep-
tion is often accurate. Incarcerated and recently released men rely on family as a key source of
economic and emotional support (Braman, 2004; Comfort, 2008,2016; Visher & Travis, 2003;
Western & Wildeman, 2009). Indeed, maintaining relationships with romantic partners has
been linked to higher quality of life for inmates (Comfort, 2008), stronger ties between incarcer-
ated fathers and children (Geller, 2013), and lower risk of recidivism (Sampson et al., 2006;
Visher & Travis, 2003). Much of the research on incarceration related relationship dissolution
has thus been focused on the harm of dissolution and strategies to prevent this outcome.
The story is somewhat more complicated for the partners of incarcerated men, for whom
the benefits of remaining together are mixed and the drawbacks of maintaining a relationship
in the shadow of the criminal justice system are substantial. Women in relationships with pris-
oners must conform their lives to the rules and regulations of the facility holding their partner
(Comfort, 2008) and provide their partner with emotional and economic support during a time
when their own resources are strained (Braman, 2004; Hagan & Dinovitzer, 1999). A growing
body of research indicates that paternal incarceration may take the greatest toll on couples with
stronger bonds of coresidence or shared children before the jail or prison spell (Turney, 2014;
Turney & Wildeman, 2013). The family resilience perspective provides a useful framework for
considering the role of relationship dissolution and repartnering as strategies for successfully
1192 FAMILY RELATIONS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT