Titles of Contention: Sociocultural Change and Conflict over Legalization of Indigenous Lands in Southeastern Ecuador

AuthorRaúl Márquez Porras,María Beatriz Eguiguren Riofrío,Ana Vera Vera
Date01 November 2018
Published date01 November 2018
DOI10.1177/0094582X18792005
Subject MatterArticlesIndigenous Communities and the State
LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES, Issue 223, Vol. 45 No. 6, November 2018, 68–80
DOI: 10.1177/0094582X18792005
© 2018 Latin American Perspectives
68
Titles of Contention
Sociocultural Change and Conflict over Legalization
of Indigenous Lands in Southeastern Ecuador
by
Raúl Márquez Porras, María Beatriz Eguiguren Riofrío, and Ana Vera Vera
Translated by
Victoria J. Furio
Shuar communities in southeastern Ecuador are receiving collective property titles to
their ancestral lands. This is being done as a way to guarantee their material and cultural
survival, but the titling triggers sociocultural changes and conflict and its outcomes
depend largely on the way it is implemented. The consequences of the titling process in
communities in Nangaritza and El Pangui in which Shuar, Saraguro, and mestizos coex-
ist include both tensions and informal arrangements to resolve the historically conflictive
issue of access to the land.
Las comunidades Shuar en el sureste de Ecuador están recibiendo títulos de propiedad
colectiva de sus tierras ancestrales. Esto se está haciendo como una forma de garantizar su
supervivencia material y cultural, pero la titulación desencadena cambios y conflictos
socioculturales y sus resultados dependen en gran medida de la forma en que se imple-
mente. Las consecuencias del proceso de titulación en comunidades de Nangaritza y El
Pangui en las que cohabitan Shuar, Saraguro y mestizos incluyen tensiones y arreglos
informales para resolver el problema histórico del acceso a la tierra.
Keywords: Land titling, Sociocultural conflicts, Indigenous peoples, Shuar, Ecuadorian
Amazon
The policy of legal recognition, or titling, of indigenous peoples’ territories
has a long history. The relevant literature points to the 1989 adoption of the
International Labor Organization’s Convention 169, which stressed ceding
ancestral lands to indigenous peoples to foster their preservation, as a land-
mark event (Aylwin, 2011; Plant and Hvalkof, 2006; Stocks, 2005). However,
Ecuador has been legalizing indigenous territories since the 1960s on an ad hoc
basis through the Instituto Ecuatoriano de Reforma Agraria y Colonización
(Ecuadorian Institute of Land Reform and Colonization—IERAC) and on a
regular basis through a new constitutionalism enshrined in the Constitution of
Raúl Márquez Porras teaches social anthropology at the Universitat de Barcelona and coordinates
the Grup de Recerca en Antropologia Jurídica. María Beatriz Eguiguren Riofrío is director of the
Observatorio de Conflictos Socioambientales at the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja. Ana
Vera Vera is a researcher at the Observatorio. Research for this article was carried out with the
support of Ecuador’s Secretaría Nacional de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
through a Prometeo grant awarded to Raúl Márquez. Victoria J. Furio is a translator living in New
York City.
792005LAPXXX10.1177/0094582X18792005Latin American PerspectivesMárquez et al. / LEGALIZATION OF INDIGENOUS LANDS IN ECUADOR
research-article2018

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT