Three more years of war.

• Author: Rothschild, Matthew
• Position: Comment

Our President promised more war. While he trumpeted his big speech on June 22 as the first step in ending the Afghanistan War, Barack Obama essentially told the American people that tens of thousands of our soldiers would still be fighting there for at least three more years.

A year from now, Obama said, all the additional "surge" troops will be back home. But the U.S. will still have close to 70,000 troops in Afghanistan, twice the number that were there when Obama took office.

Only by 2014, he said, will the Afghan people "be responsible for their own security."

And even then, Obama appears to have left himself an out. "We'll have to do the hard work of keeping the gains that we made," he said. But what if those "gains" aren't kept? Would he reverse course and keep more troops there?

He also said the United States would "build a partnership with the Afghan people that endures." Beware a euphemism for permanent military bases.

And beware bad metaphors. "The tide of war is receding," he said, but war is not a fact of nature, like an ocean. It is a rash act of rulers.

When he decided to draw some lessons from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama fed the American superiority complex. "We must embrace America's singular role in the course of human events," he said.

He told us not to succumb to isolationism--a spiel that echoed George W. Bush. The only difference was that Obama stressed the need to be "pragmatic" about the way the United States responds, arguing that often "we need not deploy large armies overseas" or act alone.

So, in an act of chutzpah, he held up Libya as an example of how the United States ought to intervene in the future. This was odd because, in the very next sentence, he said, "what sets America apart is not solely our power; it is the principles upon which our union was founded."

One of those key principles is abiding by the rule of law and by the Constitution, which gives Congress the sole power to declare war. With his war on Libya, Obama has violated the Constitution and the War Powers Act, too. His rationale for blowing off the War Powers Act was that U.S. bombers were not "engaged in hostilities" and were at little risk, since Libya's military no longer has any effective means to shoot them down. This sets a precedent for future commanders in chief to freely attack any nation that doesn't have a decent air force or surface-to-air missiles.

He said, "We're a nation that brings our enemies to justice while...