Theory to Practice: Policy Recommendations for Fostering Economic Development through Social Capital

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12925
Date01 July 2018
Published date01 July 2018
Theory to Practice: Policy Recommendations for Fostering Economic Development through Social Capital 567
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 78, Iss. 4, pp. 567–578. © 2018 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.12925.
Research Article
This manuscript was originally submitted
and accepted as a Theory to Practice
article. The feature editor, Hal G. Rainey,
is gratefully acknowledged for his work
in soliciting and developing this content.
Effective with Volume 78, the Theory to
Practice feature has been discontinued.
Barry M. Rubin is professor emeritus
in the School of Public and Environmental
Affairs at Indiana University Bloomington.
His research focuses on urban and regional
economic development and impact analysis,
state-level energy and climate-change
policy analysis, econometric modeling
and simulation of complex systems, public
sector and business analytics, and strategic
planning and management.
E-mail: rubin@indiana.edu
Trent A. Engbers is a former Peace
Corps volunteer, experienced college
educator, and nonprofit consultant living
in Evansville, Indiana. He is assistant
professor of political science and public
administration at the University of Southern
Indiana. His research on leadership,
economic development, and civic
engagement has been published widely.
He lives in Evansville with his wife Kimberly
and their four children. His TEDx Talk on
social capital and economic development
is available at https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=2vmc2sd8DI4.
E-mail: taengbers@usi.edu
Theory to Practice: Policy Recommendations for Fostering
Economic Development through Social Capital
Trent A. Engbers
University of Southern Indiana
Barry M. Rubin
Indiana University
Abstract: Proponents of social capital theory have long argued not only that it is in the best interest of civic life
to build social capital but also that social capital is vital for the economic health of communities. This has been
confirmed by recent research showing that social capital, especially in its bridging form, is positively associated with job
creation at the metropolitan statistical area level. At the same time, social capital is often viewed as something either
inherent or absent within a community. This article takes on that assumption by presenting a policy-based approach to
developing social capital. It provides two theoretical explanations for how social capital affects economic development
and identifies four lessons for economic development practitioners to use to enhance social capital. These research-based
recommendations for economic development practitioners and policy makers seek to improve the social capital and,
consequently, the economic development of their community.
Evidence for Practice
Practitioners should begin economic development activities by assessing their community’s current stock of
social capital using one of many techniques appropriate for their planned intervention.
Community stakeholders can be intentional about building relationships for economic development.
Practitioners need to expand the range and type of organizations involved in economic development planning.
Information flow can be increased and barriers reduced through social capital interventions.
Proponents of social capital theory have long
argued not only that it is in the best interest
of civic life to build social capital but also
that social capital is vital for the economic health
of communities. This has been confirmed by recent
research showing that social capital, especially in
its bridging form, is positively associated with job
creation at the metropolitan statistical area (MSA)
level (Engbers, Rubin, and Aubuchon 2016). At the
same time, social capital is often viewed as something
either inherent or absent within a community
(Fukuyama 1995). This article takes on that
assumption by presenting a policy-based approach
to developing social capital. It provides a series of
research-based recommendations for economic
development practitioners and policy makers
to improve the social capital and, consequently,
the economic development of their community.
Additionally, it provides a set of policy analysis tools
to use in understanding community social capital.
The Current State of Social Capital and
Economic Development Research
One of the challenges of exploring the relationship
between social capital and economic development
is that social capital can be thought of both as a
theory (Lin 2002) and as a concept (Ostrom 2000).1
This exploration of social capital looks at it as a
concept and its application in fostering economic
development. Social capital is like other forms of
capital (e.g., human, physical, natural) in that it is a
resource for development, but it differs from other
forms of capital in that (1) it diminishes with disuse
rather than use and (2) it is unobservable except by
proxy and difficult to measure (Ostrom 2000).
Thus, one of the most challenging parts of using social
capital to foster economic development is reaching
agreement on the meaning of social capital. A number
of dominant definitions have been advanced:
• Social capital as “the information, trust, and norms
of reciprocity inherent in one’s social networks”
(Woolcock 1998, 153)
• Social capital as the “connections among
individuals’ social networks and the norms of
reciprocity and trustworthiness that arise from
them” (Putnam 2000, 19)
• Social capital as the interpersonal resources
individuals can access through networks of both
strong and weak social relationships (Beaudoin
2009; Steffensmeier and Ulmer 2006)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT