In Their Own Words: Al Qaeda's View of the Arab Spring.

AuthorDeAtkine, Norvell

The Arab Spring engendered much optimism among many of the West's Middle East observers, who believed they were witnessing a movement toward more democratic societies that had begun to gain momentum. The same observers also speculated that the uprisings undermined Al Qaeda's doctrinal belief that only terrorist violence could overthrow the authoritarian leaders of the Arab countries. The mostly peaceful removal of Tunisia's and Egypt's rulers seemed to put the Al Qaeda doctrine, and perhaps the organization's existence, in question.

As the Arab Spring subsided, with only Tunisia's revolution--and possibly Libya's--still on a democratic projectory, fading optimism also called for a reassessment of the Arab Spring's effect on Al Qaeda. The authors, both associated with Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, argue that the Arab Spring's effect was nil. The reason for this is that Al Qaeda's leadership deftly subsumed the Arab Spring within its own ideology and took credit for the uprisings. The uprisings it described as a "step in the right direction." While the Sadat assassination was an act of the jihadist vanguard, the entire population achieved Mubarak's removal. Zawahiri, bin Laden's successor, reminded his readers that he was involved in a number of mass protests in Egypt in the Seventies.

In a number of ways, therefore, the Arab Spring cleared a...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT