The Uses of Emotion Maps in Research and Clinical Practice with Families and Couples: Methodological Innovation and Critical Inquiry

Date01 March 2015
AuthorJacqui Gabb,Reenee Singh
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12096
Published date01 March 2015
The Uses of Emotion Maps in Research and Clinical
Practice with Families and Couples: Methodological
Innovation and Critical Inquiry
JACQUI GABB*
REENEE SINGH
We explore how “emotion maps” can be productively used in clinical assessment and clin-
ical practice with families and couples. This graphic participatory method was developed
in sociological studies to examine everyday family relationships. Emotion maps enable us
to effectively “see” the dynamic experience and emotional repertoires of family life. Through
the use of a case example, in this article we illustrate how emotion maps can add to the
systemic clinicians’ repertoire of visual methods. For clinicians working with families,
couples, and young people, the importance of gaining insight into how lives are lived, at
home, cannot be understated. Producing emotion maps can encourage critical personal
reflection and expedite change in family practice. Hot spots in the household become vis ual-
ized, facilitating dialogue on prevailing issues and how these events may be perceived
differently by different family members. As emotion maps are not reliant on literacy or
language skills they can be equally completed by parents and children alik e, enabling
children’s perspective to be heard. Emotion maps can be used as assessment tools, to
demonstrate the process of change within families. Furthermore, emotion map s can be
extended to use through technology and hence are well suited particularly to working with
young people. We end the article with a wider discussion of the place of emotions and
emotion maps within systemic psychotherapy.
Keywords: Emotion Maps; Family Relationships; Visual Methods; Family Systemic
Psychotherapy; Clinical Practice
Fam Proc 54:185–197, 2015
INTRODUCTION
Emotions have had a somewhat vexed history in the field of systemic psychotherapy.
Much of the earlier systemic thinking appears to have marginalized emotions,
perhaps as a way of distinguishing systemic psychotherapy from psychoanalytic
approaches. At the same time, pioneers in the field like Salvador Minuchin (1975) and
Virginia Satir (1972) relied on techniques like enactments and sculpts that were based
on working with emotions in the room. More recently, emotions have been seen as rela-
tional, embodied, and culturally determined (Bertrando, 2008; Fredman, 2004). In this
article, attention is focussed on how to bring to the fore and work with emotions as
*Dept of Social Policy and Criminology, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Family systemic psychotherapist.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jacqui Gabb, Dept of Social Policy and
Criminology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK. E-mail: jacqui.gabb@
open.ac.uk
185
Family Process, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2015 ©2014 The Authors.
Family Process published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Family Process Institute
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use,
distributionand reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
doi: 10.1111/famp.12096

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT