The Umbrella Metaphor

Published date01 November 2020
AuthorR. Paul Battaglio,Jeremy L. Hall
Date01 November 2020
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13319
The Umbrella Metaphor 917
One of the beautiful themes of public
administration is that it continues to flourish
as a field due in no small part to its reliance
on theoretical developments in other disciplines.
Over the last century, public administration has
borrowed from myriad disciplines including, but not
limited to political science, economics, psychology,
biology, sociology, and physics. This amazing tapestry
has led to some of the discipline’s most important
research. For example, nascent research in behavioral
public administration has borrowed heavily from
psychology and economics resulting in an outpouring
of scholarship. The inclusion of so many academic
disciplines outside of public administration in our
research streams is often compared to an umbrella,
where public administration is the canopy under
which fields and subfields continue to thrive.
In other words, the theme of inclusivity and
theoretical development go hand in hand in public
administration. Our current issue embodies this
theme, with contributions and symposia borrowing
from many disciplines in an effort to bring clarity
to information technology, performance, race and
civil rights, and gender equity. For us, as editors, this
issue provides a nostalgic look back over our last two
years’ work. Many miles were traveled, and emails
exchanged to move from discrete ideas to collections
of research articles focused around these increasingly
salient topics.
We begin this issue with two research articles.
Hansen and Tummers (2020) review 42 field
experiments in public administration to explore
how they have developed over time, trends in
field experiments, and issues to take into account,
including: costs, practicality, ethics, and validity.
They conclude with recommendations for authors
to consider in developing and conducting successful
field experiments. Next, Hong (2020) explores the
effectiveness of a central government regulatory
reform policy on actual local reductions in red tape
using a quasi-experimental regression discontinuity
design. Hong finds that local levels of red tape
were reduced significantly, but only among low-
performing localities, suggesting asymmetric responses
to performance information. The effect was clearest
among those localities most reliant on the central
government for resources.
We next take up the first of four symposia (three
research, one Viewpoint) appearing in this issue.
Transformation of Government in the Era of Smart
Technology presents a collection of papers that
explore the increasing role of technology in public
administration. Guest editors Soonhee Kim (KDI
School of Public Policy and Management), Kim
Normann Andersen (Copenhagen Business School),
and Jungwoo Lee (Yonsei University) called on
scholars around the world to contribute papers and
participate in a workshop in Copenhagen in Summer,
2019. Their dedication and support are clear from the
manuscripts included.
In recent years, information technology has proven
instrumental to many facets of public administration,
including: performance, security, employee rights, and
equity (Van den Berg et al. 2020; Xu and Tang 2020).
Indeed, having the right technology in place enables
improved communication and distribution of relevant
information across agencies and governments (Vogl et
al. 2020). For public managers, a greater appreciation
of technology is necessary for the effective delivery of
services. Moreover, a greater awareness of the benefits
of information technology has raised the expectations
of public employees, managers, customers, regulators,
and end-users or citizens. In the way of an example,
Whitford et al. (2020) confirm that the adoption
of advanced robotics technology in crime labs can
be explained by familiar factors including the push
of agency professionalism, the pull of agency task
environments, and resource capacity.
Another important IT related task is the management
of institutional knowledge. Public managers, as the
arbiters of organizational information, face increased
demand from stakeholders and thus play a vital role
The Umbrella Metaphor Editorial
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 80, Iss. 6, pp. 917–920. © 2020 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13319.
Jeremy L. Hall
University of Central Florida
R. Paul Battaglio
University of Texas at Dallas

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT