The Site Gap

AuthorElliott B. Fullmer
DOI10.1177/1532673X14546987
Published date01 March 2015
Date01 March 2015
Subject MatterArticles
American Politics Research
2015, Vol. 43(2) 283 –303
© The Author(s) 2014
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X14546987
apr.sagepub.com
Article
The Site Gap: Racial
Inequalities in Early
Voting Access
Elliott B. Fullmer1
Abstract
In both 2008 and 2012, about one third of the American electorate cast
their votes early. While early voting programs are established by states,
counties have considerable discretion with regard to implementing them.
While some counties offer only a single early voting site, others offer
dozens. Previous research suggests that site density may affect the degree to
which programs increase turnout. I use county-level data from the 2008 and
2012 elections to measure whether a county’s racial and ethnic composition
predicts high (or low) levels of site density. Applying county-level data from
the Election Assistance Commission and American Community Survey, I
find that the percentage of a county identifying as Black has a significantly
negative association with early voting site density. This relationship persists
when numerous demographic covariates are included in ordinary least
squares models. These site disparities suggest that early voting may not be
achieving its full potential in heavily African American communities.
Keywords
early voting, sites, county, turnout, race
As of 2014, 33 states and the District of Columbia allow any registered citi-
zen to vote before Election Day at a physical location(s) somewhere in their
1Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA, USA
Corresponding Author:
Elliott B. Fullmer, Randolph-Macon College, P.O. Box 5005; 202 Henry Street, Ashland VA,
23005-5505, USA.
Email: elliottfullmer@rmc.edu
546987APRXXX10.1177/1532673X14546987American Politics ResearchFullmer
research-article2014
284 American Politics Research 43(2)
county (National Conference of State Legislatures [NCSL], 2014). These
early voting programs have expanded considerably in the past two decades.
According to the 1992 Current Population Survey (CPS; U.S. Bureau of the
Census, 1992), only 7% of voters participated before Election Day. In those
days, the vast majority of states only allowed early voting if a registered voter
demonstrated that participating on Election Day was burdensome. Most who
qualified for this exception were elderly, disabled, or deployed in the military.
In the early 1990s, however, early voting entered a “new phase” (Gronke &
McDonald, 2008). New laws began to appear throughout the United States,
predominately in the western part of the country. From 1992 to 2004, the
percentage of early votes among all ballots cast increased by an average of
4.25 percentage points per presidential election, reaching 20% by 2004
(Gronke & McDonald, 2008). In 2012, the figure soared to more than 30% of
the electorate, including a majority of voters in at least 9 states (McDonald,
2012).
Numerous researchers have investigated whether early voting increases
voter turnout by making the process more convenient for citizens. Most
recent studies have reported that the effect of early voting on participation
within states is nonexistent (Fitzgerald, 2005; Primo, Jacobsmeier, & Milyo,
2007;; Wolfinger, Highton, & Mullin, 2005), negligible (Gronke, Galanes-
Rosenbaum, & Miller, 2007), or even negative (Burden, Canon, Mayer, &
Moynihan, 2014; Larocca & Klemanski, 2011). Much of this research, how-
ever, fails to account for important differences in implementation within
states. Early voting administration is largely conducted at the local level and
variation across counties is often considerable. Counties, for example, typi-
cally have the freedom to determine the total number of early voting sites
they offer to voters. Los Angeles, the nation’s most populous county, offered
only one early voting site in 2008 and 2012. Meanwhile, Clark County (Las
Table 1. Top Early Voting States in the United States, 2012 (McDonald, 2012).
State Early voting rate %
Colorado 77.3
Nevada 72.4
Texas 66.4
North Carolina 63.3
New Mexico 62.3
Tennessee 55.6
Florida 52.9
Montana 51.8
Source. United States Elections Project, 2012.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT