The Sequence of Isomorphism—: The Temporal Diffusion Patterns of Quality Management in Higher Education Institutions and Hospitals

AuthorMoritz Ansmann,Markus Seyfried,Matthias Döring
Published date01 January 2022
Date01 January 2022
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211017137
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211017137
Administration & Society
2022, Vol. 54(1) 87 –116
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00953997211017137
journals.sagepub.com/home/aas
Article
The Sequence of
Isomorphism—: The
Temporal Diffusion
Patterns of Quality
Management in Higher
Education Institutions
and Hospitals
Markus Seyfried1, Matthias Döring2,
and Moritz Ansmann3
Abstract
Isomorphism has been widely used to describe why trends penetrate entire
organizational fields. However, research so far has neglected the temporal
aspects of such diffusion processes and the organizational reasons underlying
the introduction of new management tools. We argue that during reform
waves, the reasons for adopting the new tools differ over time. Using
comparative data from two surveys on quality management in the field of
higher education and the health sector, we show that early adopters are
more likely to be motivated by instrumental reasons, while late adopters will
more likely be motivated by institutional reasons.
1University of Applied Sciences for Police and Public Administration, North Rhine-Westphalia,
Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany
2University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
3University of Potsdam, Germany
Corresponding Author:
Markus Seyfried, Professor for Political Science and Governance, University of Applied
Sciences for Police and Public Administration, North Rhine-Westphalia, Nordrhein-Westfalen,
Abteilung Duisburg, Studienort Mülheim, Dümptener Straße 45, 45476 Mülheim an der Ruhr,
Germany.
Email: markus.seyfried@hspv.nrw.de
1017137AAS0010.1177/00953997211017137Administration & SocietySeyfried et al.
research-article2021
88 Administration & Society 54(1)
Keywords
isomorphism, quality management, hospitals, higher education institutions,
organization
Understanding the fundamental processes underlying the diffusion of innova-
tions has been a crucial aim of new institutional theories. Why do organiza-
tions within a specific organizational field adopt similar configurations? Why
do they tend to converge into similar organizations? The theory of isomor-
phism has introduced the crucial role of legitimacy in the organizational envi-
ronment (Boxenbaum & Jonsson, 2017; DiMaggio & Powell, 1983). Scholars
have determined different mechanisms and motivations, both functional and
dysfunctional, for the actual introduction of new instruments, such as man-
agement reforms (Beck & Walgenbach, 2005; Oliver, 1988; Willems & van
Dooren, 2011). However, the temporal aspect of this diffusion process within
an organizational field remains understudied so far.
One of the tools that has been introduced in many different organizations
is quality management (QM). In this study, we examine the temporal dynam-
ics of the diffusion process for the introduction of QM from a comparative
perspective. QM has spread across many different sectors all over the world.
Currently, there is a growing body of literature on various topics concerning
QM, mostly focusing on its effects (Cameron & Whetten, 1996; Seyfried &
Pohlenz, 2018) or impact (Bejan et al., 2015; Leiber, 2018; Makhoul, 2019).
However, particularly organizational researchers have shown that the implicit
assumptions about the impact of QM require careful scrutiny (Stensaker &
Leiber, 2015) due to several unintended consequences, such as formalization,
standardization, and resistance (Overberg, 2019; Worthington & Hodgson,
2005). Unsurprisingly, research on QM needs a broad evidence base starting
at the initial implementation phase. The starting point of the introduction of
those new management instruments, the underlying reasons, and temporal
dynamics may lay the foundations for their functionality or dysfunctionality.
Until now, the vast majority of all studies have investigated the introduc-
tion of organizational reforms from a sector-specific perspective. In contrast,
we provide a comparative approach considering the introduction of internal
QM in teaching and learning in higher education institutions (HEI) and hos-
pitals in Germany. Researchers have highlighted the particular relevance of
comparative studies for a better understanding of social phenomena (Bleiklie,
2014; Teichler, 1996). Here, we aim to follow the existing conceptions and
research on isomorphism and diffusion (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983; Kennedy
& Fiss, 2009; Tolbert & Zucker, 1983).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT