The rise of the shadow economy: An Indian perspective

Published date01 February 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1880
Date01 February 2019
AuthorPriyanka Menon
PRACTITIONER PAPER
The rise of the shadow economy: An Indian perspective
Priyanka Menon
Institute for Financial Management and
Research (IFMR), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Correspondence
Priyanka Menon, Institute for Financial
Management and Research (IFMR), No.24,
Kothari Road, Nungambakam, Chennai, TN,
India.
Email: priyanka.menon@ifmr.ac.in; priyanka.
hmenon@gmail.com
JEL Classification: H10; H26
This study was undertaken to understand the importance of the shadow economy,
which is often misunderstood and misquoted. We come to an understanding of why
this is an uproar regarding black money generation in India. This paper is an attempt
to bring forward past evidences and current situation to understand the system
through discussing various points of views in the literature. The paper concludes with
bringing out the difference in black wealth and black money and the impact of both
on the economy and answers the questionIs black money really bad for the econ-
omy? It is a hope that these results will be useful to policymakers and stakeholder
to make policies that cater to all.
1|INTRODUCTION
Corruption has always been one of the foremost concerns of the
civilians as well as the bureaucrats of any country, and the case of
India is no different. India is a growing country, which marks it as a
fertile ground for the undesirable activities. Therefore, these activities
attribute to a development of a large shadow economy for India. From
the eyes of a common man, the shadow economyis experiencing
quite a celebrity status in India, especially after the 2014 parliamen-
tary elections. It was one of the most sought after agenda used by
the winning government in India. The winning government promised
to bring out the lurking black money keeping up with their
election campaign, which particularly revolved around the agenda.
Having said so, shadow economyhas gained lot of prominence in
the current scenario.
The growth in the shadow economyhas been on a rise for a few
decades now. When observed more specifically, one finds that the
shadow economyhas been on a rise from the 1970s, and this period
is marked with the rise in the government interventions in the market
activities around the economies of the world. It is observed that the
rise in taxes and other government regulations to finance the larger
public spending lead the countries around the world to this situation,
hence, which lead to the growth of the shadow economy. To quote
Tanzi (1999) Thus a good case could be made that what came to be
called as the underground economy was a phenomenon to worry
about. Newspaper articles were ready to accept the notion that the
underground economy had increased significantly over the years, thus
casting doubts on the accuracy of the official economic statistics and
raising the prospect that large increases in tax revenue were possible,
if only the underground could be taxed. Common sense points to the
fact that the shadow economy causes inefficiency in the functioning
of the labor market and the market of goods and services and also
introduces unfair competition among companies as well as disturbs
the relation between the fellow countries. It attracts workers from
the official economy, harming them by depriving them of their rights
and guarantees, and produces a vicious circle, since their exodus from
the formal economy reduces tax revenues and consequently the
state's ability to conduct public expenditure. Moreover, the shadow
economy favors corruption and the lack of confidence in institutions
and feeds resentment among citizens. However, in the opinion of
several others, the shadow economy does generate positive effects
for a country. Schneider and Enste (2000) state that at least two thirds
of the income obtained in the shadow economy is immediately spent
in the official economy, thus generating a positive net effect.
Though the existence of the shadow economy is felt all over the
world, we would focus on India. To get a clear understanding of this
aspect, one should always understand the structure of the Indian
economy. Indian economy is a very heterogeneously divided econ-
omy. There are differences in almost all the walks of life; there is a
huge disparity between the south and the north and the east and
the west, and the differences in cultures, customs, and language add
to it. There is also a vast demarcation in the labor market. India being
a large country with a projection of gross domestic product (GDP) to
grow at 6.7% in the financial year 20172018, yet it has a very large
informal sector and a very small formal sector. The workers from the
informal sector constitute 92% of the total workforce (Kannan and
Papola (2007)). Hence, the formal sector is represented only by a very
small part of the economy.
Over the years, we have seen that this search of unknown has got
a lot of attention, and various scholars have tried measuring it using
Received: 23 August 2018 Accepted: 27 September 2018
DOI: 10.1002/pa.1880
J Public Affairs. 2019;19:e1880.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1880
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa 1of7

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT