The right medicine: why utahns need the healthy utah plan.

AuthorGochriour, Natalie

I serve on the board of Primary Children's Hospital. At a recent board retreat we heard a compelling presentation about Healthy Utah from David Patton, the executive director of the Utah Department of Health. Healthy Utah is Utah's alternative to full Medicaid expansion, and Patton is on point for Gov. Gary Herbert. I think the governor has created and negotiated an innovative and elegant policy solution to a difficult and complex policy problem. The Utah Legislature should support the Healthy Utah proposal.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

At first blush, a children's hospital board seems like the wrong audience for discussing Medicaid expansion because Medicaid already covers children from low-income families. But it didn't take long for me, and many of my fellow board members, to recognize the connection between children and adults. Family issues are children's issues. Utah families suffer when they don't have health insurance.

The success of Utah's economy is widely known. Unemployment is low, job growth is healthy and every major industry is growing. But there is a dark shadow still present in the state's economy. Far too many Utahns live at or near the poverty level and are without health insurance. We pride ourselves on being a state with strong family values, but there is nothing pro-family about an estimated 377,000 Utahns without health coverage. We can do better.

A Laudable Goal The Utah Department of Health estimates Healthy Utah will provide 92,000 low-income Utahns with health insurance coverage. These individuals are adults between the ages of 19 and 64 who earn less than $15,521 per year. The federal government will pay the full costs for the first two years of this coverage (we lost a year of federal funding by not acting sooner). In subsequent years federal government support will be less, but never lower than 90 percent.

Providing this insurance is a laudable policy goal and right for Utah families so long as it is done correctly. We have to carefully navigate the balance between fiscal prudence and needed assistance. The governor's plan finds this balance.

First, the plan promotes individual responsibility. Herbert's plan does this by charging premiums for higher-income adults, charging co-pays from all adults, offering incentives for healthy behaviors and providing support for job training. Nobody gets a free ride under the Healthy Utah proposal. Everyone has skin in the game.

Second, the plan supports private markets. Herbert's...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT