The Relationship Between Insurance and Economic Development: 85 Empirical Papers for a Review of the Literature

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2012.01219.x
AuthorJ. François Outreville
Published date01 March 2013
Date01 March 2013
Risk Management and Insurance Review
C
Risk Management and Insurance Review, 2013, Vol.16, No. 1, 71-122
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6296.2012.01219.x
PERSPECTIVE
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INSURANCE AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT:85EMPIRICAL PAPERS FOR A REVIEW OF
THE LITERATURE
J. Franc¸ois Outreville
ABSTRACT
The objective of this article is to propose a review of 85 empirical papers ex-
amining the relationships between insurance and economic development, that
is, the insurance-growth nexus. When looking at the economic importance of
the insurance sector, most papers in the past have looked at the demand side
(the level of economic development is an explanatory variable among other
factors that affect the demand for insurance). Because the role of the insurance
sector and its contribution to development is at the agenda of international
organizations and because the importance of the relationship between financial
development and economic growth has been well recognized and emphasized
in the field of economic development, more recent papers have examined the
causality links between insurance and economic development and the role of
insurance as a significant determinant in the process of economic growth.
INTRODUCTION
Even though insurance is of primordial importance in domestic economies and interna-
tionally, its role in the development process remains difficult to assess although it has
been recognized since the early 60s by some authors.1Indeed, so important is insurance
in the trade and development matrix that, at its first session in 1964, the United Na-
tions Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) formally acknowledged that
“a sound national insurance and reinsurance market is an essential characteristic of
economic growth.”2
While insurance, like other financial services, has grown in quantitative importance as
part of the general development of financial institutions, it also has become qualitatively
J. Franc¸ois Outreville works at HEC Montr ´
eal, ICER Fellow, Turin; e-mail: J-francois.
outreville@hec.ca. The author is grateful to the anonymous referees for their invaluable com-
ments and suggestions. This research has received financial support from ICER in Turin, Italy.
This article was subject to double-blind peer review.
1What Patrick (1966) emphasized about the usefulness and importance of financial development
in developing economies is borne out empirically today.
2Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Tradeand Development (1964), Final Act and
Report, p. 55, annex A.IV.23.
71
72 RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE REVIEW
more important due to the increase of risks and uncertainties in most societies. The
economic importance of the insurance sector has been increasing as part of the liberal-
ization of financial systems (including privatization) and globalization and conglomer-
ization of financial markets and during the 1990s, the total assets of insurance companies
grew faster than the assets of banks, mainly through M&As (Das et al., 2003).
The importance of the relationship between financial development (FD) and economic
growth has been well recognized and emphasized in the field of economic development.
The pioneering work of Jung (1986), Greenwood and Jovanovic (1990), and King and
Levine (1993) and subsequent work by Levine and Zervos (1998), Rousseau and Wachtel
(1998), Levine et al. (2000), and others provide evidence on the relationship between FD
and economic growth.3
Two possible patterns may coexist in the causal relationship between FD and economic
growth (Patrick, 1966). In the first, called “demand-following,” the lack of financial
growth is a manifestation of the lack of demand for financial services. As the real side of
the economy develops, the demand for various new financial services materializes. In the
second, the “supply-leading” approach, FD causes economic growth and the expansion
of the financial system precedes the demand for its services. A third view supports the bi-
directional relationship between FD and economic growth (Demetriades and Hussein,
1996; Greenwood and Smith, 1997).4Fung (2010) studies the convergence in FD and eco-
nomic growth and reports that the convergence is strongerin the early stage of economic
development, and then diminishes as sustained economic growth gets under way.
This result is important considering the case of emerging or developing countries as
many governments have, in the past, established national financial institutions with the
view that their financial system could serve their countries’ development needs. Re-
cently,some papers, inspired by this context, have focused on the relationships between
FD, insurance development, and economic development. The role of the insurance sector
and its contribution to development is also at the agenda of international organizations
such as UNCTAD, the World Bank, and the IMF (UNCTAD, 2005a,2005b).
However, the share of total insurance premiums generated in developing countries
remains at a low figure even though these countries have more than 80 percent of the
world’s population and their share in the global economy increased from 18 to 28 percent
in the past 10 years.5Given the large variation in the role of insurance across countries,
the question of the causes of this variation, and therefore the determinants of insurance
consumption, arises (USAID, 2006). When looking at the relevant literature it is obvious
that research effort has moved onto understanding the underlying factors that affect the
demand for insurance.
Despite the potential role that the insurance sector may play for financial and economic
development, there have been few studies examining the possible interaction between
insurance and economic growth.6Moreover, the bulk of the existing empirical research
3See FitzGerald (2006) for a survey and critical view.
4There is also the view that rejects the existence of a finance–growth relationship (Lucas, 1988).
5See the World Bank data at http://data.worldbank.org/.
6When reviewing this literature, there is no clear distinction between development and growth.
Almost all papers consider GDP per capita rather than GDP growth and insurance premiums
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INSURANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 73
focuses on the life insurance sector only. However, the importance of the insurance-
growth nexus7is a growing concern for research due to the increasing share of the
aggregate financial sector in almost every developing and developed country. Within
this research agenda, the objective is to investigate all the literature in this insurance-
growth nexus.
Previous surveys on the demand for insurance have only examined the determinants and
the impact of FD and economic growth (Ferry, 1977; Zeits, 2003; Hussels et al., 2005).8
This article contributes to this body of research by providing an extensive literature
review of all empirical studies that have looked at the demand side (economic growth
is an explanatory variable among other factors that affect the demand) but also by
including more recent studies that have examined the causality relationships between
insurance and economic growth (does insurance promote economic growth?).
Within the insurance-growth nexus, this survey identifies 85 empirical papers, most
of them examining the demand for life insurance. Only 22 papers are investigating
property–liability insurance. Among these studies, only 15 are looking at the causal-
ity links between insurance and economic growth. Most of these studies have found
evidence that insurance market development is characterized as a supply-leading phe-
nomenon. A distinction has to be made between national studies (50 papers) and cross-
country studies (35 papers dealing with OECD countries, emerging Asian countries, or
developing countries). From 2000 onward there is a surge of interest for national studies
of emerging Asian countries (10 papers).
The article is structured as follows. The “Measuring the Economic Significance of
Insurance Markets” section provides an assessment on how the relationship between
insurance and economic growth is measured and the significance of the insurance
markets. Section “The Demand for Insurance” section presents the theoretical approach
to the demand for insurance, which is the starting point for examining the list of
empirical papers looking at the determinants of the insurance sector’s development.
These are reviewed in the following section. While there is a plethora of research on the
causal relationship between bank lending and economic growth and capital markets
and economic growth, the insurance sector has not received ample attention in this
respect. The “Is There a Role for Insurance in Economic Growth?” section presents
the state of the empirical research looking at the causality links between insurance
and economic growth. Finally, the “Concluding Remarks and Research Implications”
section summarizes the main findings and identifies the major research implications for
further research on the insurance-growth nexus.
MEASURING THE ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF INSURANCE MARKETS
In 2010, insurance companies worldwide wrote US$4,340 billion in direct premiums;
in other words, the equivalent of about 7 percent of global GDP was used to purchase
insurance products. During the same year,insurance companies in developing countries
levels rather than insurance growth. Papers examining the demand for insurance are not con-
cerned by the concept of “demand-following.” Only a few recent papers consider how insurance
and economic growth may be related.
7This term is coined by Haiss and Sumegi (2008).
8Haiss and Sumegi (2008) also provide a literature review on the insurance-growth nexus.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT