The “Quiet Migration”: Is Intercountry Adoption a Successful Intervention In the Lives of Vulnerable Children?
Published date | 01 January 2014 |
Author | Gabriela Misca |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12070 |
Date | 01 January 2014 |
THE “QUIET MIGRATION”: IS INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION
A SUCCESSFUL INTERVENTION IN THE LIVES
OF VULNERABLE CHILDREN?
Gabriela Misca
Over the past decades international adoption has become a global phenomenon involving cross-border movementof vulnerable
children, mainly from poor, undeveloped countries to wealthier countries. Debates around international adoptions invoke
often-passionate arguments for and against. At times seen as the ultimate form of imperialism, trafficking and exploitation of
children, international adoptions are also praised as successful interventions in the lives of the most vulnerable children
worldwide.This ar ticle drawson research findings on the outcomes of international adoption and its impact on various aspects
of adopted children’s development and identifies the gaps relating to evidence-based interventions best suited to the needs of
these children postinternational adoption.
Keypoints
Based on the reviewed research findings, this paper supports the following arguments:
• overall, children adopted internationally can and do thrive in their adoptivecountries;
• such success is guaranteed by the high commitment of adoptive parents and the availability of post-adoption support
services;
• there is, however,a lack of evidence-based practice relating to interventions best suited to the needs of these children
post-international adoption;
• following a globally standardised process and strict protocols may help alleviate illicit activity in international
adoptions;
• existing guidelines must be tightened to ensure that children are the central focus in intercountry adoption and that their
development is not affected by cross-border movement.
Keywords: Child Dvelopment;IntercountryAdoption;and Postadoption Support.
INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION—A GLOBAL PHENOMENON?
Intercountry adoption, also referred to as international, overseas, or cross-border adoption, encom-
passes the transfer of children across borders into a new and often wealthier country that embraces a
different race, culture and language (Masson, 2001). This phenomenon of cross-border movement of
children—aptly labelled by demographers the “quiet migration” (Weil, 1984)—typically involves the
adoption of vulnerable and disadvantaged children in situations where poverty, abuse and neglect have
become a significant part of their life (Cuthbert, 2012). Overseas adoption is accepted as legitimate
only when the child is unable to be safely cared for by family members, or adopted within their birth
country. Intercountry adoption in practice is expected to consider the best interests of the child and
his/her human rights and usually prospective adopters have to be assessed and deemed suitable to
assume the role (Department for Education, 2012). In most cases, intercountry adoption describes
adoption of children from less developed countries into more developed countries.
The emergence of intercountry adoption as a movement of children across national borders is
linked to the humanitarian response to rescue children after World War II in Europe, and following the
Korean War in 1956 and VietnamWar in 1975 (Mather, 2007; Young, 2012). The increased prevalence
of such cross-border movement of children has been linked to major social and political changes and
“waves” of intercountry adoptions can be observed historically in conjunction with major social and
political changes. For example, a peak in the number of intercountry adoptions of children from
Correspondence: g.misca@worc.ac.uk
FAMILY COURT REVIEW,Vol. 52 No. 1, January 2014 60–68
© 2014 Association of Familyand Conciliation Cour ts
To continue reading
Request your trial