The Political Legacy of Forced Migration: Evidence from Post-WWII Germany

Published date01 August 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/00104140221141833
AuthorAnil Menon
Date01 August 2023
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Comparative Political Studies
2023, Vol. 56(9) 13981432
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00104140221141833
journals.sagepub.com/home/cps
The Political Legacy of
Forced Migration:
Evidence from
Post-WWII Germany
Anil Menon
Abstract
Do refugees reshape long-term political behavior in receiving areas? I argue
that forced migration can foster a strong group identity among refugees,
which can mobilize them toward political parties that champion their identity-
based grievances. To test this argument, I examine how one of the largest
forced migrations in modern history, the expulsion of ethnic Germans from
Eastern Europe into Germany after WWII, shaped their electoral behavior
over time. Using an original database of district-level data from 32 elections
spanning a century, I f‌ind that communities which received greater shares of
expellees remain more supportive of the expelleespolitical championsthe
radical rightover time. This relationship is particularly manifested when
identity-based grievances are unresolved and politically salient. Mechanism
evidence, including novel data on expellee monuments and associations,
suggests that a durable expellee identity helps account for these results. My
analysis reveals an enduring behavioral legacy resulting from forced migration.
Keywords
forced migration, identity, voting, radical right, time-varying historical legacy
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Corresponding Author:
Anil Menon, Cornell University, 202 White Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Email: armenon@umich.edu
Violence is a prominent feature of politics and growing evidence illustrates its
potential for producing durable political legacies (Rozenas & Zhukov, 2019).
Studies on the impact of forced migration, a recurring yet understudied form
of political violence, suggest that such experiences inf‌luence the political
attitudes and self-reported behaviors of both refugees and their descendants
(Dinas et al., 2021a;Lupu & Peisakhin, 2017).
1
However, existing research
has not examined whether these forced migrant voters reshape long-term
electoral behavior in receiving areas. The answer to this question is in-
creasingly important, as there are more refugees in the world today than at any
other time since the end of WWII (UNHCR, 2021).
Forced migration can be deeply traumatizing. This shared trauma can force
otherwise heterogeneous populations to develop a coherent identity grounded
in their victimization. Forced migrants have been found to develop such
enduring identities whether they were relocated to areas populated by co-
ethnics (Dinas et al., 2021a) or non-co-ethnics (Lupu & Peisakhin, 2017).
I argue that individuals with a forced migrant identity will support political
parties that cater to the groups political demands when their identity-based
grievances are unresolved and politically salient. I test this argument by
focusing on one of the largest forced migrations in modern history: the ex-
pulsion of ethnic Germans from Eastern Europe into Germany at the end of
WWII. Over 12 million ethnic Germans were forced to relocate into Germany,
composing 17.5% of the population.
Evidence of a lasting political legacy among German expellees has broader
relevance. Similar to conventional forced migrants, expellees lacked social
and economic capital. Like many forced migrants, they also faced tensions
with natives, forcing them to rely on each other to overcome their diff‌iculties,
fostering a strong group identity. However, unlike some conventional forced
migrants, expellees were relocated to areas inhabited by co-ethnics. Such
common ground with the native population should have facilitated not de-
terred their integration, weakening the need for a distinct identity. Thus, if we
observe a legacy of forced migration even in this setting, then we should
expect it to also manifest in situations were forced migrants are relocated
among non-co-ethnics. Take for example the forced migration of Crimean
Tartars in 1944. They were rapidly relocated to non-co-ethnic receiving areas
and did not receive immediate access to voting rights. Lupu and Peisakhin
(2017) found that even after 70 years, descendants of Crimean Tartars who
suffered more during their deportation experience identif‌ied more strongly
with their group, held more hostile attitudes toward Russia, and parti cipated
more in politics. Finally, expellees in West Germany, unlike many forced
migrants, enjoyed political freedoms and opportunities. However, existing
evidence of enduring political preferences among descendants of forced
migrants, even in contexts where forced migrants did not have such political
freedoms and opportunities, suggest that neither a democratic context nor
Menon 1399
extensive state-approved activism are necessary conditions for the emergence
of a legacy of forced migration (Lupu & Peisakhin, 2017).
I argue that the radical right has continued to attract expellee voter s for
multiple reasons. First, persecution by the Soviet Red Army cultivated deep-
seated anti-communismamong expellees (Connor, 2018, p. 190), which in
turn would have drawn them to the anti-communism of radical right parties.
Second, the radical right has consistently made appeals to expellee voters,
portraying the latter as victims of WWII, maintaining calls for the return of
expellee lands in Eastern Europe long after such demands were dropped by
mainstream parties (Mudde, 2002), and lobbying to preserve the legacy of
the German East(Alternative für Deutschland, 2020). Moreover, the radical
rights Euroskepticism might also attract expellees who resisted the inclusion
of expelling countries like Poland and the Czech Republic into the European
Union (Wood, 2005). Third, some expellees emphasized their membership in
the larger German Volk (people) to establish their right to exist in their new
surroundings in the face of native hostility. This notion of the Volk echoed
radical right rhetoric and could have made parts of the expellee community
receptive to such politics (Eisler, 2018). Fourth, expellee museums, news-
papers, youth groups, and various sociocultural events and activities facili-
tated the inter-generational transmission of a cohesive expellee identity and
provided opportunities for radical right ideas to be discussed and disseminated
(Melendy, 2003;Süssner, 2004). Finally, competitive victimhood among
some expellee descendants could also help explain their support for anti-
refugee radical right parties (Dinas et al., 2021b).
2
To test this argument, I collected district-level data on expellee allocation
across West Germany and electoral statistics from 32 elections over
100 years.
3
My f‌indings suggest that districts which received greater shares of
expellees are more supportive of the radical right over time. For instance, a
one standard deviation increase in the post-WWII expellee share adds half a
percentage point to Alternative für Deutschlandsvote share in the 2019
European elections, or a 5% increase in the partys average vote share in that
election. However, the association between expellee share and radical right
support only manifests when identity-related grievances remain unaddressed
and politically signif‌icant. It diminishes with broader societys recognition of
expellee suffering and strengthens when political developments make the
narrative of German suffering during WWII salient. Moreover, consistent with
evidence of competitive victimhood and more negative attitudes toward
contemporary refugees among some expellee descendants (Dinas et al.,
2021b), I f‌ind that areas with greater shares of expellees became more
supportive of the AfD when it transformed into an anti-refugee party between
2013 and 2017. These f‌indings corroborate a growing body of work that
emphasizes the importance of political context for activating historical leg-
acies (Charnysh, 2015;Fouka & Voth, nd;Rozenas & Zhukov, 2019).
1400 Comparative Political Studies 56(9)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT