The Physician as Expert Witness

AuthorSamuel D. Hodge, Jr./Jack E. Hubbard
ProfessionSkilled litigator, is chair of the department of legal studies at Temple University/Professor of Neurology at the University of Minnesota
Pages735-744
The Physician as
Expert Witness
Samuel D. Hodge Jr. and Avi J. Cohen
If the law has made
you a witness, remain
a man of science;
you have no victim
to avenge, no guilty
or innocent person
to convict, ruin or
save. You must bear
testimony within the
limit of science.
Dr. Paul C.H.
Brouardel
(1837–1906)
16
The following exchange took place during cross-examination of a medical expert by
defense counsel:
Q: Doctor, you stated on direct examination that the plaintiff’s herniated disk is a
direct result of the automobile accident. Did you ever treat the plaintiff before the
incident?
A: No.
Q: So, you have no idea of the condition of his back shortly before the accident, right?
A: The patient told me he had no prior back problems.
Q: Did you contact his family doctor or obtain that physician’s records to verify that
the plaintiff had no prior back problems before forming your opinion?
A: No. It was not necessary.
Q: Doctor, did you at least review the patient’s medical records from the other
physicians who treated him for his accident-related injuries?
A: I did not have to look at any other records to form my opinion. I have treated
back patients for 25 years, and I saw this patient for his accident-related injuries.
Therefore, I am more than qualified to form a belief as to the cause of his herniated
disk.
Has this physician run afoul of any ethical rule regarding expert witness testimony
issued by the medical board to which this doctor belongs, and can this physician be
sanctioned by that organization for failing to review all of the patient’s relevant medical
records before appearing in court? The answer, in many instances, is yes. The informa-
tion needed to treat a patient is very different and less strenuous from that which is
required, specifically in terms of documentation, to form an opinion in a legal proceeding
that passes ethical muster. This chapter provides an overview of the additional require-
ments involving expert testimony and offers practical tips on how these rules can be used
by attorneys during the course of litigation.
The Practice of Medicine Includes Testifying in Court
The role of a physician today is much more complex than it was years ago. Govern-
ment and insurance regulations permeate the practice of medicine, and physicians are

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT