The Pension Option in Labor Insurance and Its Effect on Household Saving and Consumption: Evidence From Taiwan

AuthorWen‐Yen Hsu,Mary A. Weiss,Hua Chen
Date01 December 2015
Published date01 December 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12047
THE PENSION OPTION IN LABOR INSURANCE AND ITS
EFFECT ON HOUSEHOLD SAVING AND CONSUMPTION:
EVIDENCE FROM TAIWAN
Hua Chen
Wen-Yen Hsu
Mary A. Weiss
ABSTRACT
Starting in 2009, the Labor Insurance (LI) program in Taiwan has allowed
workers to choose between pension old-age benefits and one-time old-age
benefits. The introduction of the pension option not only mitigates longevity
risk for workers but also provides a higher expected present value of old-age
benefits to workers than the one-time benefit option (on average). Based on a
lifecycle model with uncertain lifespan, we expect that workers will increase
current consumption and reduce saving in response to this policy intervention.
We use data from the Survey of Family Income and Expenditure in Taiwan to
empirically test this prediction. In order to isolate other systematic structural
changes or economic shocks from the true impact of the pension option on
saving and consumption, we adopt a difference-in-differences approach in this
study. Our results indicate that the implementation of pension benefits in LI
lowers households’ saving by 8.41 percent (NT$50,587) and raises consumption
by 5.73 percent (NT$42,897) for LI workers. In addition, we find that, in general,
households with less saving or consumption tend to be more responsive to this
policy in terms of reducing saving or increasing consumption.
INTRODUCTION
Developed and developing countries have instituted a wide array of social insurance
programs over the past 100 years. Important questions have arisen from the
introduction, expansion, and reform of these programs on economic agents’ behavior.
One of these questions is the effect of these programs on saving—that is, whether
Hua Chen is at the Department of Risk, Insurance and Healthcare Management, Temple
University, 1801 Fa, PA 19122. Wen-Yen Hsu is at the Department of Risk Management and
Insurance, Feng Chia University, 100 Wen Hwa Road, Taichung City, 407, Taiwan. He is also a
research fellow at the Risk and Insurance Research Center, College of Commerce, National
Chengchi University, Taiwan. Mary A. Weiss is at the Department of Risk, Insurance and
Healthcare Management, Temple University, 1801 Liacouras Walk, 624 Alter Hall,
Philadelphia, PA 19122. Correspondence should be addressed to Wen-Yen Hsu via email:
wyhsu@fcu.edu.tw. Hua Chen acknowledges the financial support from Temple University.
© 2014 The Journal of Risk and Insurance. 82, No. 4, 947–975 (2015).
DOI: 10.1111/jori.12047
947
these programs crowd out saving. Reductions in saving ultimately affect the long-
term economic growth of a country. This effect on growth must be weighed against
the potential increase in welfare associated with these programs. Welfare gains may
be obtained from increased consumption, by improving risk-sharing mechanisms,
and by allocating the resources of households more efficiently over time.
Social insurance programs may lessen uncertainty arising from various sources and,
thus, reduce the need for savings. Studies of the effect of different types of social
insurance programs on saving include disability insurance (Kantor and Fishback, 1996),
unemployment insurance (Engen and Gruber, 2001), and Medicaid (Gruber and
Yelowitz, 1999). Chou, Liu, and Hammitt (2003, 2006) and Chou, Liu, and Huang (2004)
study the impact of the implementation of National Health Insurance (NHI) for
nongovernment workers in Taiwan. The conclusion of these studies is that saving is
reduced and consumption increased as a result of the social insurance program.
While savings is associated with a country’s growth, an increase in consumption may
have important beneficial consequences as well, especially in countries that run a
current account surplus (such as many Asian countries like Taiwan). Increases in
consumption can stimulate the local economy (i.e., increase demand) and provide the
impetus to improve the economic infrastructure of a developing country (Jha, Prasad,
and Terada-Hagiwara, 2009). This would tend to insulate the country (at least
somewhat) from the deleterious effect of swings in demand for exports as occurred in
the most recent financial crisis. Therefore, it is important to gauge the impact of a
social insurance program on both saving and consumption.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect on saving and consumption from a
new pension social insurance program in Taiwan. In 2009, a new annuity pension
system in the Labor Insurance (LI) program went into effect, affecting a large part of
the working population. In the meantime, governmental employees had been
provided annuitized pension benefits since 1959, and these employees were not
affected by the policy change in LI. The different timing of offering a pension annuity
benefit to these different groups allows us to identify LI’s effect on saving and
consumption for LI workers.
More specifically, we use a “difference-in-differences” (DID) approach to compare
the change in saving and consumption of a treatment group (workers under LI) with
the change of a control group (government employees).
1
That is, the idea behind the
DID methodology is that a change in outcome for the control group reflects systematic
structural change while any outcome change in the treatment group reflects the same
1
Chou, Liu, and Hammitt (2003) also use the DID approach to empirically test how the NHI in
Taiwan affected (precautionary) saving and consumption. They hypothesize that a reduction
in uncertainty about future health expenses (the risk effect) discourages saving if households
are prudent and that the risk effect would dominate an income effect in their case. The income
effect was hypothesized to be trivial because the partial contribution of premiums paid by
employees only accounted for a small percentage of households’ expenditures. They find that
the introduction of NHI in Taiwan reduced saving by an average of 8.6–13.7 percent and raised
average consumption expenditure by 2.9–3.6 percent, with the largest impact on households
with the lowest saving.
948 THE JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT