The Partisan Consequences of Congressional Redistricting

Published date01 April 1995
AuthorPeverill Squire
DOI10.1177/1532673X9502300206
Date01 April 1995
Subject MatterArticles
THE
PARTISAN
CONSEQUENCES
OF
CONGRESSIONAL
REDISTRICTING
PEVERILL
SQUIRE
University
of
Iowa
In
an
earlier
examination
of
redistricting
plans
in
the
1970s,
the
author
found
little
evidence
that
gerrymanders
were
successful.
A
similar
examination
of
gerrymanders
in
the
1980s
finds
that
in
many
states
they
worked.
The
parties
that
drew
the
lines
usually
won
more
seats
than
they
had
before
redistricting
and
they
almost
always
held
the
seats
created
for
them.
In
addition,
redistricting
parties
usually
got
a
higher
percentage
of
seats
than
percentage
of
the
vote.
The
author
argues
that
a
general
decline
in
the
competitiveness
of
House
races
accounts
for
the
increased
success
of
gerrymanders
in
the
1980s.
No
one
disputes
that
gerrymanders
occur.
Certainly,
in
some
states
parties
try
to
draw
congressional
district
lines
to
their
benefit
and
to
their
competitors’
detriment.
But
are
these
attempts
to
gain
partisan
advantage
successful?
Can
a
party
draw
lines
that
reward
it
with
a
disproportionally
greater
percentage
of
seats
than
the
percentage
of
votes
it
receives
would
warrant?
And
even
if
a
gerrymander
is
suc-
cessful
after
the
first
election,
is
it
still
successful
after
five
elections?
In
an
earlier
article
examining
redistricting
in
seven
states
in
the
1970s,
I
found
scant
evidence
that
gerrymandering
worked,
and
that
any
initial
advantages
gained
by
the
party
drawing
the
lines
washed
out
over
the
10
years
a
plan
was
in
effect
(Squire
1985).
These
results
were
roughly
consistent
with
the
conclusions
reached
in
earlier
studies
by
Erikson
(1972)
and
Scarrow
(1982).
More
recent
examinations
of
redistricting
plans
in
the
1970s
and
1980s
by
Niemi
and
Winsky
( 1992)
and
Basehart
and
Comer
(1991)
confirm
that
initial
partisan
advan-
tages
tend
to
dissipate
over
the
course
of
five
elections.
Authors
Note:
I
thank
David
Wilkerson
for
research
assistance.
This
article
was
originally
prepared
for
presentation
at
the
14th
Hendricks
Symposium,
University
of
Nebraska,
Lincoln,
April
8-9,
1994.
AMERICAN
POLITICS
QUARTERLY,
Vol
23
No
2,
Apnl
1995
229-240
@
1995
Sage
Publicauons,
Inc
229

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT